GFI vs. CRMD
GFI (Gold Fields Limited) and CRMD (CorMedix Inc.) are both stocks. GFI operates in Gold (Basic Materials), while CRMD operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare). Over the past 10 years, GFI returned 27.45%/yr vs -1.91%/yr for CRMD. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GFI vs. CRMD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GFI achieves a -13.96% return, which is significantly higher than CRMD's -24.85% return. Over the past 10 years, GFI has outperformed CRMD with an annualized return of 27.45%, while CRMD has yielded a comparatively lower -1.91% annualized return.
GFI
- 1D
- 1.67%
- 1M
- -18.49%
- YTD
- -13.96%
- 6M
- -13.63%
- 1Y
- 50.40%
- 3Y*
- 39.19%
- 5Y*
- 32.03%
- 10Y*
- 27.45%
CRMD
- 1D
- -2.46%
- 1M
- 16.53%
- YTD
- -24.85%
- 6M
- -23.93%
- 1Y
- -41.18%
- 3Y*
- 15.11%
- 5Y*
- 1.21%
- 10Y*
- -1.91%
GFI vs. CRMD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GFI Gold Fields Limited | -13.96% | 240.42% | -6.27% | 44.90% | -2.61% | 23.33% | 43.02% | 89.47% | -16.75% | 45.29% |
CRMD CorMedix Inc. | -24.85% | 43.58% | 115.43% | -10.90% | -7.25% | -38.76% | 2.06% | 12.87% | 158.00% | -67.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between GFI and CRMD is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 13, 2010 | 0.03 |
The correlation between GFI and CRMD shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (all time) to 0.19 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
GFI:
$32.65B
CRMD:
$812.69M
GFI:
$5.39
CRMD:
$2.10
GFI:
6.78
CRMD:
4.16
GFI:
2.34
CRMD:
1.88
GFI:
3.87
CRMD:
1.86
GFI:
$13.98B
CRMD:
$400.05M
GFI:
$7.34B
CRMD:
$343.39M
GFI:
$8.04B
CRMD:
$207.97M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GFI vs. CRMD — Risk / Return Rank
GFI
CRMD
GFI vs. CRMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gold Fields Limited (GFI) and CorMedix Inc. (CRMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GFI | CRMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 0.92 | +0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.15 | -0.66 | +1.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.06 | -0.97 | +4.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GFI vs. CRMD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GFI drawdown since its inception was -88.05%, smaller than the maximum CRMD drawdown of -98.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GFI and CRMD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GFI | CRMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.05% | -98.28% | +10.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.90% | -62.26% | +18.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -43.90% | -62.26% | +18.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.22% | -66.91% | +10.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.09% | -94.77% | +31.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -38.93% | -82.29% | +43.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.25% | -77.55% | +33.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.51% | 42.56% | -26.05% |
Volatility
GFI vs. CRMD - Volatility Comparison
Gold Fields Limited (GFI) has a higher volatility of 17.70% compared to CorMedix Inc. (CRMD) at 12.12%. This indicates that GFI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRMD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GFI | CRMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.70% | 12.12% | +5.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.40% | 51.58% | -5.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 59.94% | 68.31% | -8.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 52.37% | 77.11% | -24.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 54.90% | 91.70% | -36.80% |
Dividends
GFI vs. CRMD - Dividend Comparison
GFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.04%, while CRMD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRMD CorMedix Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GFI Gold Fields Limited | 5.04% | 1.77% | 2.94% | 2.87% | 3.40% | 3.24% | 1.72% | 0.81% | 1.61% | 1.41% | 1.35% | 0.60% |
Financials
GFI vs. CRMD - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Gold Fields Limited and CorMedix Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GFI vs. CRMD - Profitability Comparison
GFI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gold Fields Limited reported a gross profit of 3.00B and revenue of 5.29B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.7%.
CRMD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CorMedix Inc. reported a gross profit of 105.12M and revenue of 127.43M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 82.5%.
GFI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gold Fields Limited reported an operating income of 2.71B and revenue of 5.29B, resulting in an operating margin of 51.3%.
CRMD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CorMedix Inc. reported an operating income of 63.66M and revenue of 127.43M, resulting in an operating margin of 50.0%.
GFI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gold Fields Limited reported a net income of 2.55B and revenue of 5.29B, resulting in a net margin of 48.2%.
CRMD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CorMedix Inc. reported a net income of 38.60M and revenue of 127.43M, resulting in a net margin of 30.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GFI and CRMD have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GFI has higher volatility (17.70%) compared to CRMD (12.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GFI dropped -88.05% vs CRMD's -98.28%.
GFI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.85 vs -0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GFI and CRMD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer