PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CRMD vs. PLTR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CRMD vs. PLTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CorMedix Inc. (CRMD) and Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRMD achieves a -29.23% return, which is significantly lower than PLTR's -20.00% return.


CRMD

1D
0.73%
1M
4.18%
YTD
-29.23%
6M
-20.25%
1Y
-34.73%
3Y*
16.99%
5Y*
2.01%
10Y*
-4.90%

PLTR

1D
-6.55%
1M
-2.62%
YTD
-20.00%
6M
-19.24%
1Y
6.78%
3Y*
113.95%
5Y*
42.70%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CRMD vs. PLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
CRMD
CorMedix Inc.
-29.23%43.58%115.43%-10.90%-7.25%-38.76%23.22%
PLTR
Palantir Technologies Inc.
-20.00%135.03%340.48%167.45%-64.74%-22.68%147.89%

Correlation

The correlation between CRMD and PLTR is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2020

0.28

The correlation between CRMD and PLTR shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (1 year) to 0.28 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CRMD:

$765.27M

PLTR:

$365.59B

EPS

CRMD:

$2.10

PLTR:

$0.89

PE Ratio

CRMD:

3.92

PLTR:

160.02

PS Ratio

CRMD:

1.77

PLTR:

69.88

PB Ratio

CRMD:

1.75

PLTR:

43.27

Total Revenue (TTM)

CRMD:

$400.05M

PLTR:

$5.22B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CRMD:

$343.39M

PLTR:

$4.39B

EBITDA (TTM)

CRMD:

$207.97M

PLTR:

$2.01B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CRMD vs. PLTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRMD
CRMD Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
CRMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRMD Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
CRMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRMD Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

PLTR
PLTR Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
PLTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLTR Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
PLTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLTR Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRMD vs. PLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CorMedix Inc. (CRMD) and Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CRMDPLTRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.51

0.13

-0.64

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.34

0.53

-0.87

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

1.07

-0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.56

0.18

-0.74

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.83

0.33

-1.17

CRMD vs. PLTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRMD Sharpe Ratio is -0.51, which is lower than the PLTR Sharpe Ratio of 0.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRMD and PLTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CRMDPLTRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.51

0.13

-0.64

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

0.66

-0.63

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.04

0.88

-0.92

Drawdowns

CRMD vs. PLTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRMD drawdown since its inception was -98.28%, which is greater than PLTR's maximum drawdown of -84.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRMD and PLTR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CRMDPLTRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.28%

-84.62%

-13.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-62.26%

-38.19%

-24.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-62.26%

-40.61%

-21.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.91%

-79.14%

+12.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-94.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-83.32%

-31.36%

-51.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-76.98%

-40.31%

-36.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

41.81%

20.40%

+21.41%

Volatility

CRMD vs. PLTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CorMedix Inc. (CRMD) is 12.63%, while Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) has a volatility of 18.39%. This indicates that CRMD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CRMDPLTRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.63%

18.39%

-5.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

52.14%

38.32%

+13.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

68.84%

51.70%

+17.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

77.14%

65.41%

+11.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

91.78%

69.86%

+21.92%

Dividends

CRMD vs. PLTR - Dividend Comparison

Neither CRMD nor PLTR has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

CRMD vs. PLTR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CorMedix Inc. and Palantir Technologies Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B20222023202420252026
127.43M
1.63B
(CRMD) Total Revenue
(PLTR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CRMD vs. PLTR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between CorMedix Inc. and Palantir Technologies Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-50.0%0.0%50.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
82.5%
86.8%
Portfolio components
CRMD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CorMedix Inc. reported a gross profit of 105.12M and revenue of 127.43M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 82.5%.

PLTR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Palantir Technologies Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.42B and revenue of 1.63B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 86.8%.

CRMD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CorMedix Inc. reported an operating income of 63.66M and revenue of 127.43M, resulting in an operating margin of 50.0%.

PLTR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Palantir Technologies Inc. reported an operating income of 754.00M and revenue of 1.63B, resulting in an operating margin of 46.2%.

CRMD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CorMedix Inc. reported a net income of 38.60M and revenue of 127.43M, resulting in a net margin of 30.3%.

PLTR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Palantir Technologies Inc. reported a net income of 870.53M and revenue of 1.63B, resulting in a net margin of 53.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CRMD and PLTR have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PLTR has higher volatility (18.39%) compared to CRMD (12.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRMD dropped -98.28% vs PLTR's -84.62%.

PLTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.13 vs -0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CRMD and PLTR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer