GFI vs. COR
GFI (Gold Fields Limited) and COR (Cencora Inc.) are both stocks. GFI operates in Gold (Basic Materials), while COR operates in Medical Distribution (Healthcare). Over the past 10 years, GFI returned 26.67%/yr vs 17.00%/yr for COR. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GFI vs. COR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GFI achieves a -15.43% return, which is significantly higher than COR's -18.53% return. Over the past 10 years, GFI has outperformed COR with an annualized return of 26.67%, while COR has yielded a comparatively lower 17.00% annualized return.
GFI
- 1D
- -2.02%
- 1M
- -20.02%
- YTD
- -15.43%
- 6M
- -10.31%
- 1Y
- 51.45%
- 3Y*
- 36.70%
- 5Y*
- 31.29%
- 10Y*
- 26.67%
COR
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- 5.22%
- YTD
- -18.53%
- 6M
- -18.54%
- 1Y
- -4.43%
- 3Y*
- 16.42%
- 5Y*
- 20.49%
- 10Y*
- 17.00%
GFI vs. COR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GFI Gold Fields Limited | -15.43% | 240.42% | -6.27% | 44.90% | -2.61% | 23.33% | 43.02% | 89.47% | -16.75% | 45.29% |
COR Cencora Inc. | -18.53% | 51.48% | 10.37% | 25.33% | 26.26% | 44.09% | 23.37% | 23.51% | -17.57% | 19.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between GFI and COR is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 24, 2007 | 0.07 |
Fundamentals
GFI:
$32.09B
COR:
$53.55B
GFI:
$5.39
COR:
$13.07
GFI:
6.66
COR:
20.97
GFI:
0.11
COR:
9.96
GFI:
2.30
COR:
0.16
GFI:
3.81
COR:
15.76
GFI:
$13.98B
COR:
$328.68B
GFI:
$7.34B
COR:
$11.66B
GFI:
$8.04B
COR:
$3.64B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GFI vs. COR — Risk / Return Rank
GFI
COR
GFI vs. COR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gold Fields Limited (GFI) and Cencora Inc. (COR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GFI | COR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.00 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.29 | -0.14 | +1.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.29 | -0.39 | +3.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GFI | COR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 | -0.15 | +1.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 | 0.92 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | 0.62 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.12 | 0.54 | -0.42 |
Drawdowns
GFI vs. COR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GFI drawdown since its inception was -88.05%, which is greater than COR's maximum drawdown of -71.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GFI and COR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GFI | COR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.05% | -71.01% | -17.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -39.97% | -32.44% | -7.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.97% | -32.44% | -7.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.22% | -32.44% | -23.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.09% | -32.44% | -30.65% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -39.97% | -26.57% | -13.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.26% | -13.62% | -30.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.69% | 11.26% | +4.43% |
Volatility
GFI vs. COR - Volatility Comparison
Gold Fields Limited (GFI) has a higher volatility of 15.34% compared to Cencora Inc. (COR) at 7.05%. This indicates that GFI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GFI | COR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.34% | 7.05% | +8.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.82% | 26.87% | +18.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 59.39% | 30.25% | +29.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 52.26% | 22.34% | +29.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 54.86% | 27.49% | +27.37% |
Dividends
GFI vs. COR - Dividend Comparison
GFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.13%, more than COR's 0.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COR Cencora Inc. | 0.86% | 0.67% | 0.93% | 0.96% | 1.13% | 5.13% | 6.74% | 7.48% | 2.07% | 1.61% | 1.77% | 1.17% |
GFI Gold Fields Limited | 5.13% | 1.77% | 2.94% | 2.87% | 3.40% | 3.24% | 1.72% | 0.81% | 1.61% | 1.41% | 1.35% | 0.60% |
Financials
GFI vs. COR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Gold Fields Limited and Cencora Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GFI vs. COR - Profitability Comparison
GFI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gold Fields Limited reported a gross profit of 3.00B and revenue of 5.29B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.7%.
COR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cencora Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.59B and revenue of 78.36B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 4.6%.
GFI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gold Fields Limited reported an operating income of 2.71B and revenue of 5.29B, resulting in an operating margin of 51.3%.
COR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cencora Inc. reported an operating income of 1.14B and revenue of 78.36B, resulting in an operating margin of 1.5%.
GFI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gold Fields Limited reported a net income of 2.55B and revenue of 5.29B, resulting in a net margin of 48.2%.
COR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cencora Inc. reported a net income of 1.64B and revenue of 78.36B, resulting in a net margin of 2.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GFI and COR have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GFI has higher volatility (15.34%) compared to COR (7.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GFI dropped -88.05% vs COR's -71.01%.
GFI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.87 vs -0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GFI and COR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer