GFI vs. AUGO

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

GFI (Gold Fields Limited) and AUGO (Aura Minerals Inc. Common Shares) are both stocks. Both operate in the Gold industry within the Basic Materials sector. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

GFI vs. AUGO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gold Fields Limited (GFI) and Aura Minerals Inc. Common Shares (AUGO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GFI achieves a -13.96% return, which is significantly lower than AUGO's 22.99% return.

GFI

• 1D: 1.67%
• 1M: -18.49%
• YTD: -13.96%
• 6M: -13.63%
• 1Y: 50.40%
• 3Y*: 39.19%
• 5Y*: 32.03%
• 10Y*: 27.45%

AUGO

• 1D: 7.62%
• 1M: -22.38%
• YTD: 22.99%
• 6M: 33.09%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GFI vs. AUGO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GFI Gold Fields Limited	-13.96%	81.80%
AUGO Aura Minerals Inc. Common Shares	22.99%	111.07%

Correlation

The correlation between GFI and AUGO is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2025	0.68

Fundamentals

Market Cap GFI : $32.65B AUGO : $5.04B
EPS GFI : $5.39 AUGO : $1.10
PE Ratio GFI : 6.78 AUGO : 55.27
PS Ratio GFI : 2.34 AUGO : 4.31
PB Ratio GFI : 3.87 AUGO : 16.69
Total Revenue (TTM) GFI : $13.98B AUGO : $1.14B
Gross Profit (TTM) GFI : $7.34B AUGO : $644.49M
EBITDA (TTM) GFI : $8.04B AUGO : $394.37M

Return for Risk

GFI vs. AUGO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GFI

GFI Risk / Return Rank: 67
GFI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
GFI Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
GFI Omega Ratio Rank: 66
GFI Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
GFI Martin Ratio Rank: 68

AUGO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GFI vs. AUGO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gold Fields Limited (GFI) and Aura Minerals Inc. Common Shares (AUGO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GFI	AUGO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.85	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.41	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.15	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.06	—	—

Drawdowns

GFI vs. AUGO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GFI drawdown since its inception was -88.05%, which is greater than AUGO's maximum drawdown of -50.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GFI and AUGO.

Drawdown Indicators

	GFI	AUGO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-88.05%	-50.65%	-37.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-43.90%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-43.90%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-56.22%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-63.09%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-38.93%	-43.63%	+4.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-44.25%	-9.38%	-34.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.51%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GFI	AUGO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.70%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	46.40%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	59.94%	67.47%	-7.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	52.37%	67.47%	-15.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	54.90%	67.47%	-12.57%

Dividends

GFI vs. AUGO - Dividend Comparison

GFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.04%, more than AUGO's 3.70% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AUGO Aura Minerals Inc. Common Shares	3.70%	1.61%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
GFI Gold Fields Limited	5.04%	1.77%	2.94%	2.87%	3.40%	3.24%	1.72%	0.81%	1.61%	1.41%	1.35%	0.60%

Financials

GFI vs. AUGO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Gold Fields Limited and Aura Minerals Inc. Common Shares over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

GFI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gold Fields Limited reported a gross profit of 3.00B and revenue of 5.29B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.7%.

AUGO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Aura Minerals Inc. Common Shares reported a gross profit of 193.50M and revenue of 382.61M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 50.6%.

GFI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gold Fields Limited reported an operating income of 2.71B and revenue of 5.29B, resulting in an operating margin of 51.3%.

AUGO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Aura Minerals Inc. Common Shares reported an operating income of 172.35M and revenue of 382.61M, resulting in an operating margin of 45.1%.

GFI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gold Fields Limited reported a net income of 2.55B and revenue of 5.29B, resulting in a net margin of 48.2%.

AUGO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Aura Minerals Inc. Common Shares reported a net income of 95.16M and revenue of 382.61M, resulting in a net margin of 24.9%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GFI and AUGO in my portfolio?

GFI and AUGO have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.