GERM vs. SILJ

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

GERM (Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF) and SILJ (Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GERM is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the Prime Treatments, Testing and Advancements Index, while SILJ is a Silver fund tracking the Nasdaq Junior Silver Miners Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, GERM returned 0.00% vs 59.34% for SILJ. GERM charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for SILJ.

Performance

GERM vs. SILJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF (GERM) and Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

GERM

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• 6M: 0.00%
• YTD: 0.00%
• 1Y: 0.00%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SILJ

• 1D: -5.10%
• 1M: -19.77%
• 6M: -27.49%
• YTD: -13.91%
• 1Y: 59.34%
• 3Y*: 36.08%
• 5Y*: 13.82%
• 10Y*: 4.74%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GERM vs. SILJ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
GERM Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SILJ Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF	-13.91%	183.89%	-5.26%

GERM vs. SILJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GERM	SILJ
Healthcare	99.3%	-
Financial Services	0.4%	0.3%
Basic Materials	-	99.8%
Communication Services	-	0.0%
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	0.2%
Energy	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

GERM vs. SILJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GERM

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SILJ

SILJ Risk / Return Rank: 33
SILJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
SILJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
SILJ Omega Ratio Rank: 35
SILJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
SILJ Martin Ratio Rank: 29

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GERM vs. SILJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF (GERM) and Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GERM	SILJ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.03	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.54	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.20	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.46	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	3.24	—

Drawdowns

GERM vs. SILJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GERM drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum SILJ drawdown of -79.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GERM and SILJ.

Drawdown Indicators

	GERM	SILJ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-79.04%	+79.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	0.00%	-40.89%	+40.89%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-40.89%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-48.29%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-70.06%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-40.89%	+40.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-41.36%	+41.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.00%	18.37%	-18.37%

Volatility

GERM vs. SILJ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF (GERM) is 0.00%, while Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF (SILJ) has a volatility of 13.91%. This indicates that GERM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SILJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GERM	SILJ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.00%	13.91%	-13.91%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.00%	47.83%	-47.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.00%	57.92%	-57.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.00%	45.04%	-45.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.00%	46.40%	-46.40%

GERM vs. SILJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

GERM has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than SILJ's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

GERM vs. SILJ - Dividend Comparison

GERM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SILJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.33%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GERM Amplify Treatments, Testing and Advancements ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SILJ Amplify Junior Silver Miners ETF	2.33%	2.00%	7.26%	0.01%	0.05%	0.36%	1.23%	1.45%	1.66%	0.00%	0.52%	2.46%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is riskier, GERM or SILJ?

SILJ has higher volatility (13.91%) compared to GERM (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GERM dropped 0.00% vs SILJ's -79.04%.

Which ETF is better, GERM or SILJ?

On 1-year performance, SILJ leads with 59.34% vs 0.00% for GERM. On fees, GERM is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, GERM has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GERM or SILJ?

Over the 1-year period, SILJ has performed better with a 59.34% return vs 0.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GERM or SILJ?

GERM is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for SILJ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GERM or SILJ?

SILJ has the higher dividend yield at 2.33%, compared with 0.00% for GERM.

What is the main difference between GERM and SILJ?

GERM is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while SILJ is Silver. GERM tracks Prime Treatments, Testing and Advancements Index, while SILJ tracks Nasdaq Junior Silver Miners Index. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for GERM and 0.69% for SILJ.