GENW vs. VEA
GENW (Genter Capital International Dividend ETF) and VEA (Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. GENW is actively managed, while VEA is passively managed. Over the past year, GENW returned 28.89% vs 32.48% for VEA. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GENW charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VEA.
Performance
GENW vs. VEA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GENW achieves a 11.53% return, which is significantly lower than VEA's 14.92% return.
GENW
- 1D
- -1.07%
- 1M
- 3.58%
- YTD
- 11.53%
- 6M
- 14.64%
- 1Y
- 28.89%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VEA
- 1D
- -0.90%
- 1M
- 5.54%
- YTD
- 14.92%
- 6M
- 18.15%
- 1Y
- 32.48%
- 3Y*
- 19.77%
- 5Y*
- 9.60%
- 10Y*
- 10.17%
GENW vs. VEA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GENW Genter Capital International Dividend ETF | 11.53% | 37.92% |
VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF | 14.92% | 36.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between GENW and VEA is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2025 | 0.85 |
The correlation between GENW and VEA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GENW vs. VEA — Risk / Return Rank
GENW
VEA
GENW vs. VEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Genter Capital International Dividend ETF (GENW) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GENW | VEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.38 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.81 | 2.81 | 0.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.40 | 10.94 | -0.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GENW | VEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.10 | 2.09 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.58 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.26 | 0.25 | +2.01 |
Drawdowns
GENW vs. VEA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GENW drawdown since its inception was -14.36%, smaller than the maximum VEA drawdown of -60.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GENW and VEA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GENW | VEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.36% | -60.68% | +46.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.32% | -11.63% | +1.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.45% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.71% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.73% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.33% | -0.90% | -0.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.69% | -13.29% | +11.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.79% | 2.98% | -0.19% |
Volatility
GENW vs. VEA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Genter Capital International Dividend ETF (GENW) is 4.96%, while Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) has a volatility of 5.66%. This indicates that GENW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GENW | VEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.96% | 5.66% | -0.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.40% | 13.32% | -1.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.79% | 15.66% | -1.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.24% | 16.55% | -0.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.24% | 17.36% | -1.12% |
GENW vs. VEA - Expense Ratio Comparison
GENW has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than VEA's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
GENW vs. VEA - Dividend Comparison
GENW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%, which matches VEA's 2.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GENW Genter Capital International Dividend ETF | 2.60% | 2.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF | 2.62% | 3.22% | 3.35% | 3.15% | 2.91% | 3.16% | 2.04% | 3.04% | 3.35% | 2.77% | 3.05% | 2.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GENW and VEA have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VEA has higher volatility (5.66%) compared to GENW (4.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GENW dropped -14.36% vs VEA's -60.68%.
On 1-year performance, VEA leads with 32.48% vs 28.89% for GENW. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, GENW has been the lower-risk option at 4.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, VEA has performed better with a 32.48% return vs 28.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for GENW.
VEA has the higher dividend yield at 2.62%, compared with 2.60% for GENW.
They also come from different issuers: Genter Capital and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for GENW and 0.03% for VEA.
GENW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GENW and VEA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer