GENT vs. VTG

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

GENT (Genter Capital Taxable Quality Intermediate ETF) and VTG (Vanguard Total Treasury ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GENT is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by Genter Capital, while VTG is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Total Return Unhedged USD Index. GENT is actively managed, while VTG is passively managed. Over the past year, GENT returned 3.33% vs 2.81% for VTG. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GENT charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VTG.

Performance

GENT vs. VTG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Genter Capital Taxable Quality Intermediate ETF (GENT) and Vanguard Total Treasury ETF (VTG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

GENT

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: -0.24%
• 6M: 0.14%
• YTD: -0.00%
• 1Y: 3.33%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

VTG

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: -0.53%
• 6M: -0.49%
• YTD: -0.43%
• 1Y: 2.81%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GENT vs. VTG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GENT Genter Capital Taxable Quality Intermediate ETF	-0.00%	3.24%
VTG Vanguard Total Treasury ETF	-0.43%	3.07%

Correlation

The correlation between GENT and VTG is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.63
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2025	0.64

The correlation between GENT and VTG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

GENT vs. VTG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GENT

GENT Risk / Return Rank: 32
GENT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
GENT Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
GENT Omega Ratio Rank: 26
GENT Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
GENT Martin Ratio Rank: 36

VTG

VTG Risk / Return Rank: 26
VTG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
VTG Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
VTG Omega Ratio Rank: 24
VTG Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
VTG Martin Ratio Rank: 24

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GENT vs. VTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Genter Capital Taxable Quality Intermediate ETF (GENT) and Vanguard Total Treasury ETF (VTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GENT	VTG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.85	0.80	+0.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.26	1.20	+0.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.14	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.71	0.98	+0.73
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.38	2.56	+1.82

GENT vs. VTG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GENT Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is comparable to the VTG Sharpe Ratio of 0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GENT and VTG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GENT vs. VTG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GENT drawdown since its inception was -2.50%, smaller than the maximum VTG drawdown of -2.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GENT and VTG.

Drawdown Indicators

	GENT	VTG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.50%	-2.89%	+0.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.96%	-2.89%	+0.93%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.30%	-2.21%	+0.91%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.70%	-0.83%	+0.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.76%	1.10%	-0.34%

Volatility

GENT vs. VTG - Volatility Comparison

Genter Capital Taxable Quality Intermediate ETF (GENT) has a higher volatility of 1.20% compared to Vanguard Total Treasury ETF (VTG) at 1.13%. This indicates that GENT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GENT	VTG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.20%	1.13%	+0.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.95%	2.64%	+0.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.93%	3.53%	+0.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.75%	3.53%	+0.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.75%	3.53%	+0.22%

GENT vs. VTG - Expense Ratio Comparison

GENT has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than VTG's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

GENT vs. VTG - Dividend Comparison

GENT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.18%, more than VTG's 3.55% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
GENT Genter Capital Taxable Quality Intermediate ETF	4.18%	4.26%	2.49%
VTG Vanguard Total Treasury ETF	3.55%	1.65%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GENT and VTG in my portfolio?

GENT and VTG have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GENT or VTG?

GENT has higher volatility (1.20%) compared to VTG (1.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GENT dropped -2.50% vs VTG's -2.89%.

Which ETF is better, GENT or VTG?

On 1-year performance, GENT leads with 3.33% vs 2.81% for VTG. On fees, VTG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GENT or VTG?

Over the 1-year period, GENT has performed better with a 3.33% return vs 2.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GENT or VTG?

VTG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for GENT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GENT or VTG?

GENT has the higher dividend yield at 4.18%, compared with 3.55% for VTG.

What is the main difference between GENT and VTG?

GENT is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while VTG is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Genter Capital and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for GENT and 0.03% for VTG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GENT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.85 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.