PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GENT vs. MYCI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GENT vs. MYCI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Genter Capital Taxable Quality Intermediate ETF (GENT) and State Street My2029 Corporate Bond ETF (MYCI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GENT achieves a -0.01% return, which is significantly lower than MYCI's 0.76% return.


GENT

1D
-0.30%
1M
-0.54%
6M
-0.18%
YTD
-0.01%
1Y
2.17%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
4.56%

MYCI

1D
-0.06%
1M
-0.06%
6M
0.43%
YTD
0.76%
1Y
3.20%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
3.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$387.58K$269.93K$333.29K
$322.15K$386.55K$198.37K

GENT vs. MYCI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
GENT
Genter Capital Taxable Quality Intermediate ETF
-0.01%7.03%-1.61%
MYCI
State Street My2029 Corporate Bond ETF
0.76%7.59%-1.58%

Correlation

The correlation between GENT and MYCI is 0.63, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2024

0.69

The correlation between GENT and MYCI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GENT vs. MYCI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GENT
GENT Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
GENT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GENT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
GENT Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
GENT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
GENT Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

MYCI
MYCI Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
MYCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MYCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
MYCI Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
MYCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
MYCI Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GENT vs. MYCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Genter Capital Taxable Quality Intermediate ETF (GENT) and State Street My2029 Corporate Bond ETF (MYCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GENTMYCIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.35

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.47

2.45

-0.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.56

8.59

-5.03

GENT vs. MYCI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GENT Sharpe Ratio is 0.73, which is lower than the MYCI Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GENT and MYCI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GENT vs. MYCI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GENT drawdown since its inception was -2.50%, roughly equal to the maximum MYCI drawdown of -2.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GENT and MYCI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GENTMYCIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.50%

-2.43%

-0.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.96%

-1.56%

-0.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.30%

-0.25%

-1.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.71%

-0.53%

-0.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.81%

0.45%

+0.36%

Volatility

GENT vs. MYCI - Volatility Comparison

Genter Capital Taxable Quality Intermediate ETF (GENT) has a higher volatility of 0.77% compared to State Street My2029 Corporate Bond ETF (MYCI) at 0.57%. This indicates that GENT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MYCI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GENTMYCIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.77%

0.57%

+0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.97%

1.66%

+1.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.93%

2.12%

+1.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.73%

2.96%

+0.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.73%

2.96%

+0.77%

GENT vs. MYCI - Expense Ratio Comparison

GENT has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than MYCI's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

GENT vs. MYCI - Dividend Comparison

GENT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.24%, less than MYCI's 4.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
GENT
Genter Capital Taxable Quality Intermediate ETF
4.24%4.26%2.49%
MYCI
State Street My2029 Corporate Bond ETF
4.17%4.56%1.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


GENT and MYCI have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GENT has higher volatility (0.77%) compared to MYCI (0.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GENT dropped -2.50% vs MYCI's -2.43%.

On 1-year performance, MYCI leads with 3.20% vs 2.17% for GENT. On fees, MYCI is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, MYCI has been the lower-risk option at 0.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MYCI has performed better with a 3.20% return vs 2.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MYCI is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for GENT.

GENT has the higher dividend yield at 4.24%, compared with 4.17% for MYCI.

GENT is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while MYCI is Corporate Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Genter Capital and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for GENT and 0.15% for MYCI.

MYCI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GENT and MYCI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer