GENT vs. MYCI

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

GENT (Genter Capital Taxable Quality Intermediate ETF) and MYCI (State Street My2029 Corporate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GENT is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by Genter Capital, while MYCI is a Corporate Bonds fund actively managed by State Street. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, GENT returned 4.37% vs 4.73% for MYCI. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GENT charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for MYCI.

Performance

GENT vs. MYCI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Genter Capital Taxable Quality Intermediate ETF (GENT) and State Street My2029 Corporate Bond ETF (MYCI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GENT achieves a 0.24% return, which is significantly lower than MYCI's 0.49% return.

GENT

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: -0.19%
• YTD: 0.24%
• 6M: 0.50%
• 1Y: 4.37%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MYCI

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 0.05%
• YTD: 0.49%
• 6M: 0.97%
• 1Y: 4.73%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GENT vs. MYCI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
GENT Genter Capital Taxable Quality Intermediate ETF	0.24%	7.03%	-1.79%
MYCI State Street My2029 Corporate Bond ETF	0.49%	7.59%	-1.56%

Correlation

The correlation between GENT and MYCI is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.61
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2024	0.69

The correlation between GENT and MYCI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

GENT vs. MYCI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GENT

GENT Risk / Return Rank: 34
GENT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
GENT Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
GENT Omega Ratio Rank: 29
GENT Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
GENT Martin Ratio Rank: 37

MYCI

MYCI Risk / Return Rank: 64
MYCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
MYCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
MYCI Omega Ratio Rank: 67
MYCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
MYCI Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GENT vs. MYCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Genter Capital Taxable Quality Intermediate ETF (GENT) and State Street My2029 Corporate Bond ETF (MYCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GENT	MYCI	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.14	2.14	-1.01
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.68	3.20	-1.53
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.42	-0.21
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.10	3.02	-0.92
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.84	11.15	-5.31
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GENT vs. MYCI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GENT Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is lower than the MYCI Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GENT and MYCI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GENT	MYCI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.14	2.14	-1.01
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.38	1.25	+0.13

Drawdowns

GENT vs. MYCI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GENT drawdown since its inception was -2.50%, roughly equal to the maximum MYCI drawdown of -2.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GENT and MYCI.

Drawdown Indicators

	GENT	MYCI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.50%	-2.41%	-0.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.96%	-1.56%	-0.40%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.06%	-0.52%	-0.54%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.69%	-0.54%	-0.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.70%	0.42%	+0.28%

Volatility

GENT vs. MYCI - Volatility Comparison

Genter Capital Taxable Quality Intermediate ETF (GENT) has a higher volatility of 0.96% compared to State Street My2029 Corporate Bond ETF (MYCI) at 0.61%. This indicates that GENT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MYCI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GENT	MYCI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.96%	0.61%	+0.35%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.75%	1.51%	+1.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.86%	2.22%	+1.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.71%	3.03%	+0.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.71%	3.03%	+0.68%

GENT vs. MYCI - Expense Ratio Comparison

GENT has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than MYCI's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

GENT vs. MYCI - Dividend Comparison

GENT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.18%, less than MYCI's 4.57% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
GENT Genter Capital Taxable Quality Intermediate ETF	4.18%	4.26%	2.49%
MYCI State Street My2029 Corporate Bond ETF	4.57%	4.56%	1.19%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GENT and MYCI in my portfolio?

GENT and MYCI have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GENT or MYCI?

GENT has higher volatility (0.96%) compared to MYCI (0.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GENT dropped -2.50% vs MYCI's -2.41%.

Which ETF is better, GENT or MYCI?

On 1-year performance, MYCI leads with 4.73% vs 4.37% for GENT. On fees, MYCI is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, MYCI has been the lower-risk option at 0.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GENT or MYCI?

Over the 1-year period, MYCI has performed better with a 4.73% return vs 4.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GENT or MYCI?

MYCI is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for GENT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GENT or MYCI?

MYCI has the higher dividend yield at 4.57%, compared with 4.18% for GENT.

What is the main difference between GENT and MYCI?

GENT is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while MYCI is Corporate Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Genter Capital and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for GENT and 0.15% for MYCI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MYCI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.