GENT vs. IBTO
GENT (Genter Capital Taxable Quality Intermediate ETF) and IBTO (iShares iBonds Dec 2033 Term Treasury ETF) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. GENT is actively managed, while IBTO is passively managed. Over the past year, GENT returned 2.17% vs 0.84% for IBTO. Their 0.74 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. GENT charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for IBTO.
Performance
GENT vs. IBTO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GENT achieves a -0.01% return, which is significantly higher than IBTO's -1.17% return.
GENT
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- -0.54%
- 6M
- -0.18%
- YTD
- -0.01%
- 1Y
- 2.17%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 4.56%
IBTO
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- -1.06%
- 6M
- -0.99%
- YTD
- -1.17%
- 1Y
- 0.84%
- 3Y*
- 2.95%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 2.48%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $387.58K | $269.93K | $333.29K | |
| $4.47M | $2.89M | $2.06M |
GENT vs. IBTO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
GENT Genter Capital Taxable Quality Intermediate ETF | -0.01% | 7.03% | 3.03% |
IBTO iShares iBonds Dec 2033 Term Treasury ETF | -1.17% | 8.23% | 1.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between GENT and IBTO is 0.63, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2024 | 0.74 |
The correlation between GENT and IBTO shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.74 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GENT vs. IBTO — Risk / Return Rank
GENT
IBTO
GENT vs. IBTO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Genter Capital Taxable Quality Intermediate ETF (GENT) and iShares iBonds Dec 2033 Term Treasury ETF (IBTO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GENT | IBTO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.08 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.47 | 0.55 | +0.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.56 | 1.25 | +2.31 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GENT vs. IBTO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GENT drawdown since its inception was -2.50%, smaller than the maximum IBTO drawdown of -8.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GENT and IBTO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GENT | IBTO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.50% | -8.36% | +5.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.96% | -3.66% | +1.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -6.91% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.30% | -3.22% | +1.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.71% | -2.37% | +1.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.81% | 1.61% | -0.80% |
Volatility
GENT vs. IBTO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Genter Capital Taxable Quality Intermediate ETF (GENT) is 0.77%, while iShares iBonds Dec 2033 Term Treasury ETF (IBTO) has a volatility of 1.04%. This indicates that GENT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBTO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GENT | IBTO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.77% | 1.04% | -0.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.97% | 3.28% | -0.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.93% | 4.31% | -0.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.73% | 6.51% | -2.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.73% | 6.51% | -2.78% |
GENT vs. IBTO - Expense Ratio Comparison
GENT has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than IBTO's 0.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
GENT vs. IBTO - Dividend Comparison
GENT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.24%, more than IBTO's 4.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GENT Genter Capital Taxable Quality Intermediate ETF | 4.24% | 4.26% | 2.49% | 0.00% |
IBTO iShares iBonds Dec 2033 Term Treasury ETF | 3.83% | 4.05% | 4.23% | 1.66% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GENT and IBTO have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IBTO has higher volatility (1.04%) compared to GENT (0.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GENT dropped -2.50% vs IBTO's -8.36%.
On 1-year performance, GENT leads with 2.17% vs 0.84% for IBTO. On fees, IBTO is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, GENT has been the lower-risk option at 0.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GENT has performed better with a 2.17% return vs 0.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBTO is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for GENT.
GENT has the higher dividend yield at 4.24%, compared with 3.83% for IBTO.
They also come from different issuers: Genter Capital and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for GENT and 0.07% for IBTO.
GENT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.73 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GENT and IBTO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer