GENT vs. USFI
GENT (Genter Capital Taxable Quality Intermediate ETF) and USFI (BrandywineGLOBAL - U.S. Fixed Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GENT is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by Genter Capital, while USFI is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by BrandywineGLOBAL. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, GENT returned 2.17% vs 2.86% for USFI. Their 0.67 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. GENT charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for USFI.
Performance
GENT vs. USFI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GENT achieves a -0.01% return, which is significantly lower than USFI's 0.56% return.
GENT
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- -0.54%
- 6M
- -0.18%
- YTD
- -0.01%
- 1Y
- 2.17%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 4.56%
USFI
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- -0.83%
- 6M
- 0.47%
- YTD
- 0.56%
- 1Y
- 2.86%
- 3Y*
- 3.91%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.82%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $387.58K | $269.93K | $333.29K | |
| $231.12 | $248.47 | $6.98K |
GENT vs. USFI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
GENT Genter Capital Taxable Quality Intermediate ETF | -0.01% | 7.03% | 3.03% |
USFI BrandywineGLOBAL - U.S. Fixed Income ETF | 0.56% | 6.96% | 3.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between GENT and USFI is 0.54, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2024 | 0.67 |
The correlation between GENT and USFI shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (1 year) to 0.67 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GENT vs. USFI — Risk / Return Rank
GENT
USFI
GENT vs. USFI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Genter Capital Taxable Quality Intermediate ETF (GENT) and BrandywineGLOBAL - U.S. Fixed Income ETF (USFI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GENT | USFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.22 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.47 | 3.46 | -1.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.56 | 8.04 | -4.48 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GENT vs. USFI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GENT drawdown since its inception was -2.50%, smaller than the maximum USFI drawdown of -8.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GENT and USFI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GENT | USFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.50% | -8.47% | +5.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.96% | -1.11% | -0.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -7.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.30% | -1.00% | -0.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.71% | -2.06% | +1.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.81% | 0.47% | +0.34% |
Volatility
GENT vs. USFI - Volatility Comparison
Genter Capital Taxable Quality Intermediate ETF (GENT) and BrandywineGLOBAL - U.S. Fixed Income ETF (USFI) have volatilities of 0.77% and 0.74%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GENT | USFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.77% | 0.74% | +0.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.97% | 1.66% | +1.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.93% | 3.20% | +0.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.73% | 6.84% | -3.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.73% | 6.84% | -3.11% |
GENT vs. USFI - Expense Ratio Comparison
GENT has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than USFI's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
GENT vs. USFI - Dividend Comparison
GENT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.24%, less than USFI's 4.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GENT Genter Capital Taxable Quality Intermediate ETF | 4.24% | 4.26% | 2.49% | 0.00% |
USFI BrandywineGLOBAL - U.S. Fixed Income ETF | 4.04% | 4.42% | 4.60% | 1.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GENT and USFI have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GENT has higher volatility (0.77%) compared to USFI (0.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GENT dropped -2.50% vs USFI's -8.47%.
On 1-year performance, USFI leads with 2.86% vs 2.17% for GENT. On fees, GENT is cheaper at 0.38% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, USFI has performed better with a 2.86% return vs 2.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GENT is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for USFI.
GENT has the higher dividend yield at 4.24%, compared with 4.04% for USFI.
GENT is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while USFI is Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: Genter Capital and BrandywineGLOBAL. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for GENT and 0.39% for USFI.
USFI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.19 vs 0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GENT and USFI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer