PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBTO vs. DMBS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IBTO vs. DMBS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Dec 2033 Term Treasury ETF (IBTO) and Doubleline Etf Trust - Mortgage ETF (DMBS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IBTO achieves a -1.17% return, which is significantly lower than DMBS's -0.38% return.


IBTO

1D
-0.27%
1M
-1.06%
6M
-0.99%
YTD
-1.17%
1Y
0.84%
3Y*
2.95%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.48%

DMBS

1D
-0.47%
1M
-1.36%
6M
-0.85%
YTD
-0.38%
1Y
3.05%
3Y*
4.54%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
3.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$3.27M$2.67M$3.33M
$4.47M$2.89M$2.06M

IBTO vs. DMBS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
IBTO
iShares iBonds Dec 2033 Term Treasury ETF
-1.17%8.23%-0.87%1.71%
DMBS
Doubleline Etf Trust - Mortgage ETF
-0.38%8.54%2.09%2.01%

Correlation

The correlation between IBTO and DMBS is 0.93, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2023

0.93

The correlation between IBTO and DMBS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IBTO vs. DMBS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IBTO
IBTO Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
IBTO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBTO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBTO Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
IBTO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBTO Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

DMBS
DMBS Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
DMBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DMBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
DMBS Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
DMBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
DMBS Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IBTO vs. DMBS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2033 Term Treasury ETF (IBTO) and Doubleline Etf Trust - Mortgage ETF (DMBS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IBTODMBSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.17

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.55

1.25

-0.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.25

3.65

-2.40

IBTO vs. DMBS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IBTO Sharpe Ratio is 0.47, which is lower than the DMBS Sharpe Ratio of 0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IBTO and DMBS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IBTO vs. DMBS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IBTO drawdown since its inception was -8.36%, roughly equal to the maximum DMBS drawdown of -8.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBTO and DMBS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IBTODMBSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.36%

-8.14%

-0.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.66%

-3.20%

-0.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.91%

-6.19%

-0.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.22%

-2.46%

-0.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.37%

-1.69%

-0.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.61%

1.09%

+0.52%

Volatility

IBTO vs. DMBS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares iBonds Dec 2033 Term Treasury ETF (IBTO) is 1.04%, while Doubleline Etf Trust - Mortgage ETF (DMBS) has a volatility of 1.31%. This indicates that IBTO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DMBS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IBTODMBSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.04%

1.31%

-0.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.28%

3.37%

-0.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.31%

4.17%

+0.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.51%

6.21%

+0.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.51%

6.21%

+0.30%

IBTO vs. DMBS - Expense Ratio Comparison

IBTO has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than DMBS's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

IBTO vs. DMBS - Dividend Comparison

IBTO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.18%, less than DMBS's 5.19% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
DMBS
Doubleline Etf Trust - Mortgage ETF
4.78%4.96%4.97%2.82%
IBTO
iShares iBonds Dec 2033 Term Treasury ETF
3.83%4.05%4.23%1.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, IBTO and DMBS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

DMBS has higher volatility (1.31%) compared to IBTO (1.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBTO dropped -8.36% vs DMBS's -8.14%.

On 3-year performance, DMBS leads with 4.54% vs 2.95% for IBTO. On fees, IBTO is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, IBTO has been the lower-risk option at 1.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, DMBS has performed better with a 4.54% return vs 2.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBTO is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for DMBS.

DMBS has the higher dividend yield at 4.78%, compared with 3.83% for IBTO.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and DoubleLine. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IBTO and 0.49% for DMBS.

DMBS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.96 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IBTO and DMBS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer