IBTO vs. IBTM
IBTO (iShares iBonds Dec 2033 Term Treasury ETF) and IBTM (iShares iBonds Dec 2032 Term Treasury ETF) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds from iShares - IBTO tracks the ICE 2033 Maturity US Treasury Index while IBTM tracks the ICE 2032 Maturity US Treasury Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, IBTO returned 4.04% vs 3.93% for IBTM. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.07% expense ratio.
Performance
IBTO vs. IBTM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBTO achieves a -0.58% return, which is significantly lower than IBTM's -0.50% return.
IBTO
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- -0.17%
- YTD
- -0.58%
- 6M
- -1.02%
- 1Y
- 4.04%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBTM
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- -0.15%
- YTD
- -0.50%
- 6M
- -0.81%
- 1Y
- 3.93%
- 3Y*
- 2.68%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBTO vs. IBTM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IBTO iShares iBonds Dec 2033 Term Treasury ETF | -0.58% | 8.23% | -0.87% | 1.71% |
IBTM iShares iBonds Dec 2032 Term Treasury ETF | -0.50% | 8.06% | -0.14% | 1.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBTO and IBTM is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2023 | 0.99 |
The correlation between IBTO and IBTM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IBTO vs. IBTM — Risk / Return Rank
IBTO
IBTM
IBTO vs. IBTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2033 Term Treasury ETF (IBTO) and iShares iBonds Dec 2032 Term Treasury ETF (IBTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IBTO | IBTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.17 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.11 | 1.21 | -0.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.21 | 3.51 | -0.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IBTO | IBTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 | 0.96 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.20 | +0.23 |
Drawdowns
IBTO vs. IBTM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBTO drawdown since its inception was -8.36%, smaller than the maximum IBTM drawdown of -13.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBTO and IBTM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IBTO | IBTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.36% | -13.60% | +5.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.66% | -3.26% | -0.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -7.86% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.63% | -2.38% | -0.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.37% | -4.82% | +2.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.26% | 1.12% | +0.14% |
Volatility
IBTO vs. IBTM - Volatility Comparison
iShares iBonds Dec 2033 Term Treasury ETF (IBTO) has a higher volatility of 1.32% compared to iShares iBonds Dec 2032 Term Treasury ETF (IBTM) at 1.20%. This indicates that IBTO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBTM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IBTO | IBTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.32% | 1.20% | +0.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.02% | 2.75% | +0.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.46% | 4.09% | +0.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.61% | 7.56% | -0.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.61% | 7.56% | -0.95% |
IBTO vs. IBTM - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both IBTO and IBTM have an expense ratio of 0.07%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IBTO vs. IBTM - Dividend Comparison
IBTO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.15%, more than IBTM's 3.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBTM iShares iBonds Dec 2032 Term Treasury ETF | 3.95% | 3.87% | 3.96% | 3.39% | 1.38% |
IBTO iShares iBonds Dec 2033 Term Treasury ETF | 4.15% | 4.05% | 4.23% | 1.66% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, IBTO and IBTM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
IBTO has higher volatility (1.32%) compared to IBTM (1.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IBTO dropped -8.36% vs IBTM's -13.60%.
On 1-year performance, IBTO leads with 4.04% vs 3.93% for IBTM. Both ETFs have the same 0.07% expense ratio. On volatility, IBTM has been the lower-risk option at 1.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IBTO has performed better with a 4.04% return vs 3.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBTO and IBTM have the same expense ratio: 0.07% per year.
IBTO has the higher dividend yield at 4.15%, compared with 3.95% for IBTM.
IBTO tracks ICE 2033 Maturity US Treasury Index, while IBTM tracks ICE 2032 Maturity US Treasury Index.
IBTM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.96 vs 0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IBTO and IBTM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer