GENT vs. EDGF

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GENT (Genter Capital Taxable Quality Intermediate ETF) and EDGF (3EDGE Dynamic Fixed Income ETF) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, GENT returned 4.16% vs 3.57% for EDGF. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GENT charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for EDGF.

Performance

GENT vs. EDGF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Genter Capital Taxable Quality Intermediate ETF (GENT) and 3EDGE Dynamic Fixed Income ETF (EDGF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GENT achieves a 0.09% return, which is significantly lower than EDGF's 0.90% return.

GENT

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: 0.01%
• YTD: 0.09%
• 6M: 0.16%
• 1Y: 4.16%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EDGF

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 0.12%
• YTD: 0.90%
• 6M: 0.84%
• 1Y: 3.57%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GENT vs. EDGF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
GENT Genter Capital Taxable Quality Intermediate ETF	0.09%	7.03%	-1.68%
EDGF 3EDGE Dynamic Fixed Income ETF	0.90%	4.36%	-1.41%

Correlation

The correlation between GENT and EDGF is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.40
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2024	0.55

The correlation between GENT and EDGF shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (1 year) to 0.55 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

GENT vs. EDGF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GENT

GENT Risk / Return Rank: 34
GENT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
GENT Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
GENT Omega Ratio Rank: 29
GENT Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
GENT Martin Ratio Rank: 38

EDGF

EDGF Risk / Return Rank: 69
EDGF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
EDGF Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
EDGF Omega Ratio Rank: 62
EDGF Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
EDGF Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GENT vs. EDGF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Genter Capital Taxable Quality Intermediate ETF (GENT) and 3EDGE Dynamic Fixed Income ETF (EDGF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GENT	EDGF	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.08	1.85	-0.76
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.60	2.92	-1.32
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.37	-0.18
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.13	5.57	-3.44
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.89	14.29	-8.40
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GENT vs. EDGF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GENT Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is lower than the EDGF Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GENT and EDGF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GENT	EDGF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.08	1.85	-0.76
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.36	0.98	+0.38

Drawdowns

GENT vs. EDGF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GENT drawdown since its inception was -2.50%, which is greater than EDGF's maximum drawdown of -1.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GENT and EDGF.

Drawdown Indicators

	GENT	EDGF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.50%	-1.62%	-0.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.96%	-0.64%	-1.32%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.20%	-0.07%	-1.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.69%	-0.46%	-0.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.71%	0.25%	+0.46%

Volatility

GENT vs. EDGF - Volatility Comparison

Genter Capital Taxable Quality Intermediate ETF (GENT) has a higher volatility of 0.90% compared to 3EDGE Dynamic Fixed Income ETF (EDGF) at 0.28%. This indicates that GENT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EDGF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GENT	EDGF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.90%	0.28%	+0.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.75%	1.26%	+1.49%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.86%	1.94%	+1.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.71%	2.35%	+1.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.71%	2.35%	+1.36%

GENT vs. EDGF - Expense Ratio Comparison

GENT has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than EDGF's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

GENT vs. EDGF - Dividend Comparison

GENT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.18%, more than EDGF's 3.45% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
EDGF 3EDGE Dynamic Fixed Income ETF	3.45%	3.61%	0.49%
GENT Genter Capital Taxable Quality Intermediate ETF	4.18%	4.26%	2.49%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GENT and EDGF in my portfolio?

GENT and EDGF have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GENT or EDGF?

GENT has higher volatility (0.90%) compared to EDGF (0.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GENT dropped -2.50% vs EDGF's -1.62%.

Which ETF is better, GENT or EDGF?

On 1-year performance, GENT leads with 4.16% vs 3.57% for EDGF. On fees, GENT is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, EDGF has been the lower-risk option at 0.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GENT or EDGF?

Over the 1-year period, GENT has performed better with a 4.16% return vs 3.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GENT or EDGF?

GENT is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for EDGF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GENT or EDGF?

GENT has the higher dividend yield at 4.18%, compared with 3.45% for EDGF.

What is the main difference between GENT and EDGF?

They also come from different issuers: Genter Capital and 3EDGE Asset Management. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for GENT and 0.79% for EDGF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EDGF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.