PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GEMG vs. BABX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GEMG vs. BABX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long GEMI Daily ETF (GEMG) and GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF (BABX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GEMG achieves a -87.55% return, which is significantly lower than BABX's -51.94% return.


GEMG

1D
-3.78%
1M
-24.60%
YTD
-87.55%
6M
-90.68%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BABX

1D
-1.03%
1M
-31.89%
YTD
-51.94%
6M
-54.19%
1Y
-30.10%
3Y*
-9.27%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GEMG vs. BABX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
GEMG
Leverage Shares 2X Long GEMI Daily ETF
-87.55%-71.91%
BABX
GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF
-51.94%-22.69%

Correlation

The correlation between GEMG and BABX is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2025

0.08

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GEMG vs. BABX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GEMG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


BABX
BABX Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
BABX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BABX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
BABX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
BABX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
BABX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GEMG vs. BABX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long GEMI Daily ETF (GEMG) and GraniteShares 2x Long BABA Daily ETF (BABX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GEMGBABXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.80

GEMG vs. BABX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GEMG vs. BABX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GEMG drawdown since its inception was -97.26%, which is greater than BABX's maximum drawdown of -72.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GEMG and BABX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GEMGBABXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.26%

-72.87%

-24.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-72.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-72.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-96.71%

-72.87%

-23.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-80.97%

-45.52%

-35.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

38.89%

Volatility

GEMG vs. BABX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GEMGBABXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

58.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

220.57%

87.58%

+132.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

220.57%

82.88%

+137.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

220.57%

82.88%

+137.69%

GEMG vs. BABX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GEMG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than BABX's 1.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

GEMG vs. BABX - Dividend Comparison

Neither GEMG nor BABX has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


GEMG and BABX have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GEMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GEMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for BABX.

GEMG and BABX have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for GEMG and 1.15% for BABX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GEMG and BABX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer