GEME vs. EMDV
Compare and contrast key facts about Pacific North of South Global Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF (GEME) and ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF (EMDV).
GEME and EMDV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GEME is an actively managed fund by Pacific AM. It was launched on Jan 22, 2025. EMDV is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Masters Index. It was launched on Jan 25, 2016.
Performance
GEME vs. EMDV - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GEME vs. EMDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GEME Pacific North of South Global Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF | 8.97% | 37.35% |
EMDV ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF | -1.51% | 12.46% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GEME achieves a 8.97% return, which is significantly higher than EMDV's -1.51% return.
GEME
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- -8.35%
- YTD
- 8.97%
- 6M
- 16.69%
- 1Y
- 44.13%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EMDV
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- -1.99%
- YTD
- -1.51%
- 6M
- 2.47%
- 1Y
- 8.67%
- 3Y*
- 1.57%
- 5Y*
- -2.81%
- 10Y*
- 2.24%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GEME vs. EMDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
GEME has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than EMDV's 0.60% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GEME vs. EMDV — Risk / Return Rank
GEME
EMDV
GEME vs. EMDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacific North of South Global Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF (GEME) and ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF (EMDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GEME | EMDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.96 | 0.73 | +1.23 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.52 | 1.07 | +1.45 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.15 | +0.24 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.20 | 1.19 | +2.00 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.41 | 3.94 | +8.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GEME | EMDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.96 | 0.73 | +1.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.18 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.12 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.83 | 0.20 | +1.62 |
Correlation
The correlation between GEME and EMDV is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GEME vs. EMDV - Dividend Comparison
GEME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.43%, more than EMDV's 2.47% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GEME Pacific North of South Global Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF | 6.43% | 7.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EMDV ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF | 2.47% | 2.46% | 2.79% | 1.88% | 3.68% | 2.12% | 3.12% | 2.38% | 1.27% | 2.09% | 2.87% |
Drawdowns
GEME vs. EMDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GEME drawdown since its inception was -16.86%, smaller than the maximum EMDV drawdown of -39.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GEME and EMDV.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GEME | EMDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.86% | -39.20% | +22.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.00% | -7.48% | -6.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.97% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.20% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.06% | -17.05% | +6.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.29% | -13.53% | +11.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.66% | 2.26% | +1.40% |
Volatility
GEME vs. EMDV - Volatility Comparison
Pacific North of South Global Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF (GEME) has a higher volatility of 9.13% compared to ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF (EMDV) at 4.86%. This indicates that GEME's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GEME | EMDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.13% | 4.86% | +4.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.23% | 8.30% | +7.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.68% | 11.95% | +10.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.29% | 15.40% | +6.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.29% | 18.28% | +4.01% |