GEME vs. EMIF
Compare and contrast key facts about Pacific North of South Global Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF (GEME) and iShares Emerging Markets Infrastructure ETF (EMIF).
GEME and EMIF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GEME is an actively managed fund by Pacific AM. It was launched on Jan 22, 2025. EMIF is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Emerging Markets Infrastructure Index. It was launched on Jun 16, 2009.
Performance
GEME vs. EMIF - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GEME vs. EMIF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GEME Pacific North of South Global Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF | 8.22% | 37.35% |
EMIF iShares Emerging Markets Infrastructure ETF | 6.16% | 32.88% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GEME achieves a 8.22% return, which is significantly higher than EMIF's 6.16% return.
GEME
- 1D
- 3.20%
- 1M
- -10.02%
- YTD
- 8.22%
- 6M
- 16.66%
- 1Y
- 44.40%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EMIF
- 1D
- 1.91%
- 1M
- -8.08%
- YTD
- 6.16%
- 6M
- 12.77%
- 1Y
- 39.99%
- 3Y*
- 13.95%
- 5Y*
- 6.54%
- 10Y*
- 2.68%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GEME vs. EMIF - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both GEME and EMIF have an expense ratio of 0.75%.
Return for Risk
GEME vs. EMIF — Risk / Return Rank
GEME
EMIF
GEME vs. EMIF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacific North of South Global Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF (GEME) and iShares Emerging Markets Infrastructure ETF (EMIF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GEME | EMIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.97 | 2.41 | -0.44 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.53 | 3.15 | -0.62 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.47 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.12 | 3.78 | -0.65 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.31 | 13.68 | -1.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GEME | EMIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.97 | 2.41 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.33 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.13 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.79 | 0.18 | +1.61 |
Correlation
The correlation between GEME and EMIF is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
GEME vs. EMIF - Dividend Comparison
GEME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.48%, more than EMIF's 4.67% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GEME Pacific North of South Global Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF | 6.48% | 7.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EMIF iShares Emerging Markets Infrastructure ETF | 4.67% | 4.96% | 4.12% | 2.64% | 3.08% | 3.94% | 2.54% | 2.07% | 2.64% | 2.58% | 3.16% | 2.07% |
Drawdowns
GEME vs. EMIF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GEME drawdown since its inception was -16.86%, smaller than the maximum EMIF drawdown of -48.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GEME and EMIF.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GEME | EMIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.86% | -48.02% | +31.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.21% | -10.49% | -3.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -23.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -48.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.68% | -8.65% | -2.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.26% | -16.00% | +13.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.60% | 2.89% | +0.71% |
Volatility
GEME vs. EMIF - Volatility Comparison
Pacific North of South Global Emerging Markets Equity Active ETF (GEME) has a higher volatility of 11.17% compared to iShares Emerging Markets Infrastructure ETF (EMIF) at 7.64%. This indicates that GEME's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMIF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GEME | EMIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.17% | 7.64% | +3.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.23% | 12.00% | +4.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.67% | 16.67% | +6.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.32% | 19.63% | +2.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.32% | 20.61% | +1.71% |