PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GDXW vs. GBUG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GDXW vs. GBUG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Gold Miners Weeklypay ETF (GDXW) and Sprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETF (GBUG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GDXW achieves a -3.22% return, which is significantly lower than GBUG's -1.44% return.


GDXW

1D
1.75%
1M
0.20%
YTD
-3.22%
6M
3.82%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GBUG

1D
1.17%
1M
0.96%
YTD
-1.44%
6M
7.57%
1Y
63.04%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GDXW vs. GBUG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GDXW and GBUG is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2025

0.97

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GDXW vs. GBUG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GDXW

GBUG
GBUG Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
GBUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GBUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
GBUG Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
GBUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
GBUG Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GDXW vs. GBUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Gold Miners Weeklypay ETF (GDXW) and Sprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETF (GBUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GDXW vs. GBUG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GDXWGBUGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

1.74

-1.23

Drawdowns

GDXW vs. GBUG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GDXW drawdown since its inception was -36.83%, which is greater than GBUG's maximum drawdown of -32.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDXW and GBUG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GDXWGBUGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.83%

-32.10%

-4.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-31.82%

-25.98%

-5.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.58%

-7.68%

-5.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.52%

Volatility

GDXW vs. GBUG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GDXWGBUGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

61.21%

47.62%

+13.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

61.21%

47.31%

+13.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

61.21%

47.31%

+13.90%

GDXW vs. GBUG - Expense Ratio Comparison

GDXW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than GBUG's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

GDXW vs. GBUG - Dividend Comparison

GDXW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 38.71%, more than GBUG's 1.58% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, GDXW and GBUG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, GBUG is cheaper at 0.89% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GBUG is cheaper with a 0.89% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for GDXW.

GDXW has the higher dividend yield at 38.71%, compared with 1.58% for GBUG.

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Sprott. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for GDXW and 0.89% for GBUG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GDXW and GBUG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer