PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GDXJ vs. VDC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GDXJ vs. VDC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) and Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GDXJ achieves a -19.44% return, which is significantly lower than VDC's 9.80% return. Over the past 10 years, GDXJ has outperformed VDC with an annualized return of 8.88%, while VDC has yielded a comparatively lower 7.53% annualized return.


GDXJ

1D
-0.59%
1M
-14.51%
6M
-28.43%
YTD
-19.44%
1Y
41.67%
3Y*
36.72%
5Y*
17.40%
10Y*
8.88%
ALL TIME*
1.34%

VDC

1D
-0.39%
1M
2.01%
6M
3.84%
YTD
9.80%
1Y
7.27%
3Y*
7.55%
5Y*
7.07%
10Y*
7.53%
ALL TIME*
9.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GDXJ vs. VDC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GDXJ
VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF
-19.44%172.28%15.67%7.12%-14.53%-21.25%30.40%40.44%-11.02%8.22%
VDC
Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF
9.80%2.17%13.30%2.38%-1.79%17.64%10.86%26.11%-7.79%11.85%

Correlation

The correlation between GDXJ and VDC is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2009

0.15

The correlation between GDXJ and VDC shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (1 year) to 0.18 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

GDXJ vs. VDC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GDXJ
VDC

Basic Materials

100.0%
0.6%

Financial Services

0.1%

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

1.2%

Consumer Defensive

-

96.7%

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

0.0%

Industrials

-

0.6%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

0.5%

Utilities

-

-

Basic Materials

GDXJ
100.0%
VDC
0.6%

Financial Services

GDXJ
0.1%
VDC

-

Communication Services

GDXJ

-

VDC

-

Consumer Cyclical

GDXJ

-

VDC
1.2%

Consumer Defensive

GDXJ

-

VDC
96.7%

Energy

GDXJ

-

VDC

-

Healthcare

GDXJ

-

VDC
0.0%

Industrials

GDXJ

-

VDC
0.6%

Real Estate

GDXJ

-

VDC

-

Technology

GDXJ

-

VDC
0.5%

Utilities

GDXJ

-

VDC

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GDXJ vs. VDC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GDXJ
GDXJ Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
GDXJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDXJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDXJ Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
GDXJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDXJ Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

VDC
VDC Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
VDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
VDC Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
VDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
VDC Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GDXJ vs. VDC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) and Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GDXJVDCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.10

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.01

0.79

+0.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.31

1.50

+0.81

GDXJ vs. VDC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GDXJ Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is higher than the VDC Sharpe Ratio of 0.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GDXJ and VDC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GDXJ vs. VDC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GDXJ drawdown since its inception was -88.66%, which is greater than VDC's maximum drawdown of -34.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDXJ and VDC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GDXJVDCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.66%

-34.24%

-54.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-41.32%

-9.28%

-32.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-41.32%

-11.78%

-29.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.79%

-16.55%

-32.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.77%

-25.31%

-32.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-41.32%

-5.02%

-36.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-60.31%

-3.74%

-56.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.12%

4.87%

+13.25%

Volatility

GDXJ vs. VDC - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) has a higher volatility of 13.30% compared to Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC) at 5.38%. This indicates that GDXJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VDC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GDXJVDCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.30%

5.38%

+7.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

44.66%

10.86%

+33.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

53.43%

13.39%

+40.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

41.90%

13.35%

+28.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.18%

14.73%

+29.45%

GDXJ vs. VDC - Expense Ratio Comparison

GDXJ has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than VDC's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

GDXJ vs. VDC - Dividend Comparison

GDXJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.89%, more than VDC's 2.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GDXJ
VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF
2.89%2.33%2.61%0.72%0.51%1.78%1.58%0.39%0.45%0.03%4.78%0.72%
VDC
Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF
2.09%2.26%2.33%2.65%2.37%2.14%2.50%2.44%2.78%2.52%2.39%2.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


GDXJ and VDC have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GDXJ has higher volatility (13.30%) compared to VDC (5.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GDXJ dropped -88.66% vs VDC's -34.24%.

On 10-year performance, GDXJ leads with 8.88% vs 7.53% for VDC. On fees, VDC is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, VDC has been the lower-risk option at 5.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, GDXJ has performed better with a 8.88% return vs 7.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VDC is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for GDXJ.

GDXJ has the higher dividend yield at 2.89%, compared with 2.09% for VDC.

GDXJ is categorized as Gold, while VDC is Consumer Staples Equities. GDXJ tracks MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index, while VDC tracks MSCI US Investable Market Consumer Staples 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.52% for GDXJ and 0.09% for VDC.

GDXJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.79 vs 0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GDXJ and VDC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer