GDXJ vs. OPGSX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GDXJ (VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF) and OPGSX (Invesco Gold & Special Minerals Fund) are both funds - GDXJ is a Gold fund tracking the MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index, while OPGSX is a Precious Metals fund managed by Invesco. Over the past 10 years, GDXJ returned 13.07%/yr vs 15.19%/yr for OPGSX. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GDXJ charges 0.52%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for OPGSX.

Performance

GDXJ vs. OPGSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) and Invesco Gold & Special Minerals Fund (OPGSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GDXJ achieves a -2.55% return, which is significantly lower than OPGSX's 3.54% return. Over the past 10 years, GDXJ has underperformed OPGSX with an annualized return of 13.07%, while OPGSX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.19% annualized return.

GDXJ

• 1D: -4.40%
• 1M: -1.95%
• YTD: -2.55%
• 6M: 6.26%
• 1Y: 65.12%
• 3Y*: 46.12%
• 5Y*: 17.46%
• 10Y*: 13.07%

OPGSX

• 1D: 1.33%
• 1M: 1.97%
• YTD: 3.54%
• 6M: 10.42%
• 1Y: 57.81%
• 3Y*: 38.46%
• 5Y*: 16.13%
• 10Y*: 15.19%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GDXJ vs. OPGSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GDXJ VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF	-2.55%	172.28%	15.67%	7.12%	-14.53%	-21.25%	30.40%	40.44%	-11.02%	8.22%
OPGSX Invesco Gold & Special Minerals Fund	3.54%	131.03%	13.05%	6.35%	-16.86%	-2.75%	36.15%	46.37%	-13.15%	17.17%

Correlation

The correlation between GDXJ and OPGSX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.90
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 12, 2009	0.93

The correlation between GDXJ and OPGSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

GDXJ vs. OPGSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GDXJ

GDXJ Risk / Return Rank: 35
GDXJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
GDXJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
GDXJ Omega Ratio Rank: 35
GDXJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
GDXJ Martin Ratio Rank: 32

OPGSX

OPGSX Risk / Return Rank: 28
OPGSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
OPGSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
OPGSX Omega Ratio Rank: 27
OPGSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
OPGSX Martin Ratio Rank: 23

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GDXJ vs. OPGSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) and Invesco Gold & Special Minerals Fund (OPGSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GDXJ	OPGSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.32	1.54	-0.22
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.74	1.98	-0.24
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.27	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.99	2.28	-0.29
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.95	5.89	-0.94
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GDXJ vs. OPGSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GDXJ Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is comparable to the OPGSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GDXJ and OPGSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GDXJ	OPGSX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.32	1.54	-0.22
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.43	0.49	-0.07
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.30	0.47	-0.17
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.06	0.26	-0.20

Drawdowns

GDXJ vs. OPGSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GDXJ drawdown since its inception was -88.66%, which is greater than OPGSX's maximum drawdown of -80.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDXJ and OPGSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GDXJ	OPGSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-88.66%	-80.04%	-8.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-32.92%	-29.01%	-3.91%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-32.92%	-29.01%	-3.91%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-50.99%	-47.09%	-3.90%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-57.77%	-47.09%	-10.68%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-29.01%	-22.32%	-6.69%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-60.50%	-29.29%	-31.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.19%	10.74%	+2.45%

Volatility

GDXJ vs. OPGSX - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) has a higher volatility of 16.66% compared to Invesco Gold & Special Minerals Fund (OPGSX) at 13.17%. This indicates that GDXJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OPGSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GDXJ	OPGSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.66%	13.17%	+3.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	41.34%	35.90%	+5.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	49.79%	43.24%	+6.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	41.10%	33.57%	+7.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	44.06%	32.88%	+11.18%

GDXJ vs. OPGSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GDXJ has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is lower than OPGSX's 1.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

GDXJ vs. OPGSX - Dividend Comparison

GDXJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.39%, more than OPGSX's 0.41% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GDXJ VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF	2.39%	2.33%	2.61%	0.72%	0.51%	1.78%	1.58%	0.39%	0.45%	0.03%	4.78%	0.72%
OPGSX Invesco Gold & Special Minerals Fund	0.41%	0.43%	0.86%	0.81%	0.45%	3.56%	1.55%	0.29%	0.00%	2.78%	7.21%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GDXJ and OPGSX in my portfolio?

GDXJ and OPGSX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GDXJ or OPGSX?

GDXJ has higher volatility (16.66%) compared to OPGSX (13.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GDXJ dropped -88.66% vs OPGSX's -80.04%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

OPGSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.