GDXJ vs. KGLD
GDXJ (VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF) and KGLD (Kurv Gold Enhanced Income ETF ) are both exchange-traded funds - GDXJ is a Gold fund tracking the MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index, while KGLD is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Kurv. GDXJ is passively managed, while KGLD is actively managed. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GDXJ charges 0.52%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for KGLD.
Performance
GDXJ vs. KGLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GDXJ achieves a -11.59% return, which is significantly lower than KGLD's -0.07% return.
GDXJ
- 1D
- -10.11%
- 1M
- -18.05%
- YTD
- -11.59%
- 6M
- -3.54%
- 1Y
- 45.51%
- 3Y*
- 40.69%
- 5Y*
- 15.20%
- 10Y*
- 11.93%
KGLD
- 1D
- -3.79%
- 1M
- -8.71%
- YTD
- -0.07%
- 6M
- 2.65%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GDXJ vs. KGLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GDXJ VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF | -11.59% | 75.33% |
KGLD Kurv Gold Enhanced Income ETF | -0.07% | 29.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between GDXJ and KGLD is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2025 | 0.78 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GDXJ vs. KGLD — Risk / Return Rank
GDXJ
KGLD
GDXJ vs. KGLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) and Kurv Gold Enhanced Income ETF (KGLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GDXJ | KGLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.28 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.38 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GDXJ | KGLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.04 | 1.14 | -1.10 |
Drawdowns
GDXJ vs. KGLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GDXJ drawdown since its inception was -88.66%, which is greater than KGLD's maximum drawdown of -21.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDXJ and KGLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GDXJ | KGLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.66% | -21.79% | -66.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.60% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.60% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.99% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.77% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -35.60% | -21.79% | -13.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -60.49% | -6.22% | -54.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.49% | — | — |
Volatility
GDXJ vs. KGLD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GDXJ | KGLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.56% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.70% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.84% | 28.90% | +21.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.33% | 28.90% | +12.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.16% | 28.90% | +15.26% |
GDXJ vs. KGLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
GDXJ has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is lower than KGLD's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
GDXJ vs. KGLD - Dividend Comparison
GDXJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.63%, less than KGLD's 13.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDXJ VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF | 2.63% | 2.33% | 2.61% | 0.72% | 0.51% | 1.78% | 1.58% | 0.39% | 0.45% | 0.03% | 4.78% | 0.72% |
KGLD Kurv Gold Enhanced Income ETF | 13.02% | 4.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GDXJ and KGLD have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GDXJ is cheaper at 0.52% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GDXJ is cheaper with a 0.52% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for KGLD.
KGLD has the higher dividend yield at 13.02%, compared with 2.63% for GDXJ.
GDXJ is categorized as Gold, while KGLD is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Kurv. Their fees differ too: 0.52% for GDXJ and 1.00% for KGLD.
Find the right allocation for GDXJ and KGLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer