GDXJ vs. IAUI
GDXJ (VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF) and IAUI (NEOS Gold High Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GDXJ is a Gold fund tracking the MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index, while IAUI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Neos. GDXJ is passively managed, while IAUI is actively managed. Over the past year, GDXJ returned 45.51% vs 19.26% for IAUI. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GDXJ charges 0.52%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for IAUI.
Performance
GDXJ vs. IAUI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GDXJ achieves a -11.59% return, which is significantly lower than IAUI's -1.07% return.
GDXJ
- 1D
- -10.11%
- 1M
- -18.05%
- YTD
- -11.59%
- 6M
- -3.54%
- 1Y
- 45.51%
- 3Y*
- 40.69%
- 5Y*
- 15.20%
- 10Y*
- 11.93%
IAUI
- 1D
- -3.26%
- 1M
- -6.70%
- YTD
- -1.07%
- 6M
- 1.17%
- 1Y
- 19.26%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GDXJ vs. IAUI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GDXJ VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF | -11.59% | 64.60% |
IAUI NEOS Gold High Income ETF | -1.07% | 20.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between GDXJ and IAUI is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2025 | 0.78 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GDXJ vs. IAUI — Risk / Return Rank
GDXJ
IAUI
GDXJ vs. IAUI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) and NEOS Gold High Income ETF (IAUI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GDXJ | IAUI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.28 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.38 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GDXJ | IAUI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.04 | 0.95 | -0.90 |
Drawdowns
GDXJ vs. IAUI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GDXJ drawdown since its inception was -88.66%, which is greater than IAUI's maximum drawdown of -16.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDXJ and IAUI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GDXJ | IAUI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.66% | -16.88% | -71.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.60% | -16.88% | -18.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.60% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.99% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.77% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -35.60% | -16.10% | -19.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -60.49% | -3.54% | -56.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.49% | — | — |
Volatility
GDXJ vs. IAUI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GDXJ | IAUI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.56% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.70% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.84% | 20.51% | +30.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.33% | 20.51% | +20.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.16% | 20.51% | +23.65% |
GDXJ vs. IAUI - Expense Ratio Comparison
GDXJ has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is lower than IAUI's 0.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
GDXJ vs. IAUI - Dividend Comparison
GDXJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.63%, less than IAUI's 13.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDXJ VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF | 2.63% | 2.33% | 2.61% | 0.72% | 0.51% | 1.78% | 1.58% | 0.39% | 0.45% | 0.03% | 4.78% | 0.72% |
IAUI NEOS Gold High Income ETF | 13.00% | 6.88% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GDXJ and IAUI have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On 1-year performance, GDXJ leads with 45.51% vs 19.26% for IAUI. On fees, GDXJ is cheaper at 0.52% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GDXJ has performed better with a 45.51% return vs 19.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GDXJ is cheaper with a 0.52% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for IAUI.
IAUI has the higher dividend yield at 13.00%, compared with 2.63% for GDXJ.
GDXJ is categorized as Gold, while IAUI is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.52% for GDXJ and 0.78% for IAUI.
Find the right allocation for GDXJ and IAUI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer