PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GDXJ vs. IAUI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GDXJ vs. IAUI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) and NEOS Gold High Income ETF (IAUI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GDXJ achieves a -11.59% return, which is significantly lower than IAUI's -1.07% return.


GDXJ

1D
-10.11%
1M
-18.05%
YTD
-11.59%
6M
-3.54%
1Y
45.51%
3Y*
40.69%
5Y*
15.20%
10Y*
11.93%

IAUI

1D
-3.26%
1M
-6.70%
YTD
-1.07%
6M
1.17%
1Y
19.26%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GDXJ vs. IAUI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
GDXJ
VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF
-11.59%64.60%
IAUI
NEOS Gold High Income ETF
-1.07%20.56%

Correlation

The correlation between GDXJ and IAUI is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2025

0.78

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GDXJ vs. IAUI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GDXJ
GDXJ Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
GDXJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDXJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDXJ Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
GDXJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDXJ Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

IAUI
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GDXJ vs. IAUI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) and NEOS Gold High Income ETF (IAUI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GDXJIAUIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.38

GDXJ vs. IAUI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GDXJIAUIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.04

0.95

-0.90

Drawdowns

GDXJ vs. IAUI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GDXJ drawdown since its inception was -88.66%, which is greater than IAUI's maximum drawdown of -16.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDXJ and IAUI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GDXJIAUIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.66%

-16.88%

-71.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.60%

-16.88%

-18.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-35.60%

-16.10%

-19.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-60.49%

-3.54%

-56.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.49%

Volatility

GDXJ vs. IAUI - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GDXJIAUIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

42.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

50.84%

20.51%

+30.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

41.33%

20.51%

+20.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.16%

20.51%

+23.65%

GDXJ vs. IAUI - Expense Ratio Comparison

GDXJ has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is lower than IAUI's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

GDXJ vs. IAUI - Dividend Comparison

GDXJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.63%, less than IAUI's 13.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GDXJ
VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF
2.63%2.33%2.61%0.72%0.51%1.78%1.58%0.39%0.45%0.03%4.78%0.72%
IAUI
NEOS Gold High Income ETF
13.00%6.88%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GDXJ and IAUI have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On 1-year performance, GDXJ leads with 45.51% vs 19.26% for IAUI. On fees, GDXJ is cheaper at 0.52% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GDXJ has performed better with a 45.51% return vs 19.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GDXJ is cheaper with a 0.52% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for IAUI.

IAUI has the higher dividend yield at 13.00%, compared with 2.63% for GDXJ.

GDXJ is categorized as Gold, while IAUI is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.52% for GDXJ and 0.78% for IAUI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GDXJ and IAUI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer