IAUI vs. IAUM
IAUI (NEOS Gold High Income ETF) and IAUM (iShares Gold Trust Micro) are both exchange-traded funds - IAUI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Neos, while IAUM is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM. IAUI is actively managed, while IAUM is passively managed. Over the past year, IAUI returned 15.59% vs 24.40% for IAUM. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. IAUI charges 0.78%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for IAUM.
Performance
IAUI vs. IAUM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IAUI achieves a -3.56% return, which is significantly lower than IAUM's -2.86% return.
IAUI
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- -6.04%
- YTD
- -3.56%
- 6M
- -5.45%
- 1Y
- 15.59%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IAUM
- 1D
- -0.62%
- 1M
- -7.06%
- YTD
- -2.86%
- 6M
- -5.65%
- 1Y
- 24.40%
- 3Y*
- 29.63%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IAUI vs. IAUM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IAUI NEOS Gold High Income ETF | -3.56% | 20.00% |
IAUM iShares Gold Trust Micro | -2.86% | 27.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between IAUI and IAUM is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2025 | 0.97 |
The correlation between IAUI and IAUM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IAUI vs. IAUM — Risk / Return Rank
IAUI
IAUM
IAUI vs. IAUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Gold High Income ETF (IAUI) and iShares Gold Trust Micro (IAUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IAUI | IAUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.19 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.77 | 1.01 | -0.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.32 | 2.74 | -0.42 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IAUI vs. IAUM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IAUI drawdown since its inception was -20.43%, smaller than the maximum IAUM drawdown of -24.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IAUI and IAUM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IAUI | IAUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.43% | -24.37% | +3.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.43% | -24.37% | +3.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -24.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.21% | -22.36% | +4.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.07% | -5.45% | +1.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.75% | 8.94% | -2.19% |
Volatility
IAUI vs. IAUM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for NEOS Gold High Income ETF (IAUI) is 7.56%, while iShares Gold Trust Micro (IAUM) has a volatility of 7.99%. This indicates that IAUI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IAUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IAUI | IAUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.56% | 7.99% | -0.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.70% | 24.04% | -4.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.34% | 27.25% | -5.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.98% | 18.09% | +2.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.98% | 18.09% | +2.89% |
IAUI vs. IAUM - Expense Ratio Comparison
IAUI has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than IAUM's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
IAUI vs. IAUM - Dividend Comparison
IAUI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.48%, while IAUM has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
IAUI NEOS Gold High Income ETF | 14.48% | 6.88% |
IAUM iShares Gold Trust Micro | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, IAUI and IAUM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
IAUM has higher volatility (7.99%) compared to IAUI (7.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IAUI dropped -20.43% vs IAUM's -24.37%.
On 1-year performance, IAUM leads with 24.40% vs 15.59% for IAUI. On fees, IAUM is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, IAUI has been the lower-risk option at 7.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IAUM has performed better with a 24.40% return vs 15.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IAUM is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for IAUI.
IAUI has the higher dividend yield at 14.48%, compared with 0.00% for IAUM.
IAUI is categorized as Derivative Income, while IAUM is Gold. They also come from different issuers: Neos and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.78% for IAUI and 0.09% for IAUM.
IAUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.90 vs 0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IAUI and IAUM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer