GDXJ vs. GREK
GDXJ (VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF) and GREK (Global X MSCI Greece ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GDXJ is a Gold fund tracking the MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index, while GREK is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Greece Select 25-50. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GDXJ returned 12.00%/yr vs 16.01%/yr for GREK. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GDXJ charges 0.52%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for GREK.
Performance
GDXJ vs. GREK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GDXJ achieves a -8.37% return, which is significantly lower than GREK's 15.45% return. Over the past 10 years, GDXJ has underperformed GREK with an annualized return of 12.00%, while GREK has yielded a comparatively higher 16.01% annualized return.
GDXJ
- 1D
- 3.15%
- 1M
- -19.14%
- YTD
- -8.37%
- 6M
- -6.68%
- 1Y
- 51.06%
- 3Y*
- 44.17%
- 5Y*
- 16.23%
- 10Y*
- 12.00%
GREK
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- 5.63%
- YTD
- 15.45%
- 6M
- 15.54%
- 1Y
- 38.63%
- 3Y*
- 32.67%
- 5Y*
- 24.30%
- 10Y*
- 16.01%
GDXJ vs. GREK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDXJ VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF | -8.37% | 172.28% | 15.67% | 7.12% | -14.53% | -21.25% | 30.40% | 40.44% | -11.02% | 8.22% |
GREK Global X MSCI Greece ETF | 15.45% | 76.11% | 9.53% | 42.72% | 3.64% | 6.14% | -13.89% | 50.20% | -31.25% | 34.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between GDXJ and GREK is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2011 | 0.20 |
The correlation between GDXJ and GREK shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (all time) to 0.37 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
GDXJ vs. GREK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GDXJ
GREK
Basic Materials
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
GDXJ
GREK
Communication Services
GDXJ
-
GREK
Consumer Cyclical
GDXJ
-
GREK
Consumer Defensive
GDXJ
-
GREK
Energy
GDXJ
-
GREK
Financial Services
GDXJ
-
GREK
Healthcare
GDXJ
-
GREK
-
Industrials
GDXJ
-
GREK
Real Estate
GDXJ
-
GREK
Technology
GDXJ
-
GREK
-
Utilities
GDXJ
-
GREK
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GDXJ vs. GREK — Risk / Return Rank
GDXJ
GREK
GDXJ vs. GREK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) and Global X MSCI Greece ETF (GREK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GDXJ | GREK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.28 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.30 | 1.82 | -0.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.55 | 5.62 | -2.07 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GDXJ vs. GREK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GDXJ drawdown since its inception was -88.66%, which is greater than GREK's maximum drawdown of -79.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDXJ and GREK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GDXJ | GREK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.66% | -79.50% | -9.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -39.47% | -21.32% | -18.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.47% | -22.63% | -16.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.76% | -30.46% | -19.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.77% | -57.04% | -0.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.25% | -1.44% | -31.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -60.45% | -45.25% | -15.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.41% | 6.90% | +7.51% |
Volatility
GDXJ vs. GREK - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) has a higher volatility of 19.46% compared to Global X MSCI Greece ETF (GREK) at 8.69%. This indicates that GDXJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GREK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GDXJ | GREK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.46% | 8.69% | +10.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.41% | 20.65% | +22.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.54% | 24.35% | +27.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.50% | 24.44% | +17.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.23% | 29.71% | +14.52% |
GDXJ vs. GREK - Expense Ratio Comparison
GDXJ has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is lower than GREK's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
GDXJ vs. GREK - Dividend Comparison
GDXJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, less than GREK's 3.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDXJ VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF | 2.54% | 2.33% | 2.61% | 0.72% | 0.51% | 1.78% | 1.58% | 0.39% | 0.45% | 0.03% | 4.78% | 0.72% |
GREK Global X MSCI Greece ETF | 3.00% | 3.46% | 4.63% | 2.61% | 2.82% | 2.16% | 2.62% | 2.25% | 2.41% | 2.13% | 1.95% | 1.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GDXJ and GREK have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GDXJ has higher volatility (19.46%) compared to GREK (8.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GDXJ dropped -88.66% vs GREK's -79.50%.
On 10-year performance, GREK leads with 16.01% vs 12.00% for GDXJ. On fees, GDXJ is cheaper at 0.52% per year. On volatility, GREK has been the lower-risk option at 8.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, GREK has performed better with a 16.01% return vs 12.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GDXJ is cheaper with a 0.52% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for GREK.
GREK has the higher dividend yield at 3.00%, compared with 2.54% for GDXJ.
GDXJ is categorized as Gold, while GREK is Emerging Markets Equities. GDXJ tracks MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index, while GREK tracks MSCI All Greece Select 25-50. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.52% for GDXJ and 0.58% for GREK.
GREK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GDXJ and GREK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer