GDXJ vs. GOEX
GDXJ (VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF) and GOEX (Global X Gold Explorers ETF) are both Gold funds - GDXJ tracks the MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index while GOEX tracks the Solactive Global Gold Explorers & Developers Total Return. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GDXJ returned 12.49%/yr vs 13.58%/yr for GOEX. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GDXJ charges 0.52%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for GOEX.
Performance
GDXJ vs. GOEX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GDXJ achieves a -1.67% return, which is significantly higher than GOEX's -3.57% return. Over the past 10 years, GDXJ has underperformed GOEX with an annualized return of 12.49%, while GOEX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.58% annualized return.
GDXJ
- 1D
- 7.31%
- 1M
- -3.86%
- YTD
- -1.67%
- 6M
- 1.67%
- 1Y
- 60.69%
- 3Y*
- 47.07%
- 5Y*
- 18.78%
- 10Y*
- 12.49%
GOEX
- 1D
- 7.67%
- 1M
- -5.32%
- YTD
- -3.57%
- 6M
- -0.17%
- 1Y
- 63.83%
- 3Y*
- 47.73%
- 5Y*
- 19.79%
- 10Y*
- 13.58%
GDXJ vs. GOEX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDXJ VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF | -1.67% | 172.28% | 15.67% | 7.12% | -14.53% | -21.25% | 30.40% | 40.44% | -11.02% | 8.22% |
GOEX Global X Gold Explorers ETF | -3.57% | 179.50% | 19.38% | 1.99% | -14.63% | -14.45% | 34.98% | 36.73% | -14.84% | 12.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between GDXJ and GOEX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2010 | 0.93 |
The correlation between GDXJ and GOEX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
GDXJ vs. GOEX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GDXJ
GOEX
Basic Materials
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Basic Materials
GDXJ
GOEX
Communication Services
GDXJ
-
GOEX
-
Consumer Cyclical
GDXJ
-
GOEX
-
Consumer Defensive
GDXJ
-
GOEX
-
Energy
GDXJ
-
GOEX
-
Financial Services
GDXJ
-
GOEX
-
Healthcare
GDXJ
-
GOEX
-
Industrials
GDXJ
-
GOEX
Real Estate
GDXJ
-
GOEX
-
Technology
GDXJ
-
GOEX
-
Utilities
GDXJ
-
GOEX
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GDXJ vs. GOEX — Risk / Return Rank
GDXJ
GOEX
GDXJ vs. GOEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) and Global X Gold Explorers ETF (GOEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GDXJ | GOEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.23 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.55 | 1.62 | -0.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.21 | 4.47 | -0.26 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GDXJ vs. GOEX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GDXJ drawdown since its inception was -88.66%, roughly equal to the maximum GOEX drawdown of -88.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDXJ and GOEX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GDXJ | GOEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.66% | -88.83% | +0.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -39.47% | -39.64% | +0.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.47% | -39.64% | +0.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.79% | -47.16% | -1.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.77% | -53.66% | -4.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -28.37% | -28.84% | +0.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -60.44% | -63.51% | +3.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.52% | 14.42% | +0.10% |
Volatility
GDXJ vs. GOEX - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) has a higher volatility of 20.97% compared to Global X Gold Explorers ETF (GOEX) at 18.95%. This indicates that GDXJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GOEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GDXJ | GOEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.97% | 18.95% | +2.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.85% | 42.19% | +1.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 52.08% | 51.19% | +0.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.64% | 39.51% | +2.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.27% | 40.16% | +4.11% |
GDXJ vs. GOEX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GDXJ has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is lower than GOEX's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
GDXJ vs. GOEX - Dividend Comparison
GDXJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.37%, more than GOEX's 2.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDXJ VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF | 2.37% | 2.33% | 2.61% | 0.72% | 0.51% | 1.78% | 1.58% | 0.39% | 0.45% | 0.03% | 4.78% | 0.72% |
GOEX Global X Gold Explorers ETF | 2.16% | 2.08% | 2.46% | 0.05% | 1.04% | 2.35% | 2.62% | 1.60% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 38.91% | 11.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, GDXJ and GOEX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
GDXJ has higher volatility (20.97%) compared to GOEX (18.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GDXJ dropped -88.66% vs GOEX's -88.83%.
On 10-year performance, GOEX leads with 13.58% vs 12.49% for GDXJ. On fees, GDXJ is cheaper at 0.52% per year. On volatility, GOEX has been the lower-risk option at 18.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, GOEX has performed better with a 13.58% return vs 12.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GDXJ is cheaper with a 0.52% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for GOEX.
GDXJ has the higher dividend yield at 2.37%, compared with 2.16% for GOEX.
GDXJ tracks MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index, while GOEX tracks Solactive Global Gold Explorers & Developers Total Return. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.52% for GDXJ and 0.65% for GOEX.
GOEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.26 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GDXJ and GOEX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer