GDXJ vs. EART
GDXJ (VanEck Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF) and EART (Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF) are both Materials funds - GDXJ tracks the MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index while EART tracks the Solactive Rare Earth & Critical Materials Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, GDXJ returned 46.12%/yr vs 21.75%/yr for EART. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GDXJ charges 0.54%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for EART.
Performance
GDXJ vs. EART - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GDXJ achieves a -2.55% return, which is significantly lower than EART's 17.65% return.
GDXJ
- 1D
- -4.40%
- 1M
- -1.95%
- YTD
- -2.55%
- 6M
- 6.26%
- 1Y
- 65.12%
- 3Y*
- 46.12%
- 5Y*
- 17.46%
- 10Y*
- 13.07%
EART
- 1D
- -1.81%
- 1M
- 2.78%
- YTD
- 17.65%
- 6M
- 28.34%
- 1Y
- 118.80%
- 3Y*
- 21.75%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GDXJ vs. EART - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDXJ VanEck Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF | -2.55% | 172.28% | 15.67% | 7.12% | -7.81% |
EART Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF | 17.65% | 98.48% | -7.19% | -19.75% | -16.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between GDXJ and EART is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2022 | 0.57 |
The correlation between GDXJ and EART has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GDXJ vs. EART — Risk / Return Rank
GDXJ
EART
GDXJ vs. EART - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) and Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF (EART). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GDXJ | EART | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.45 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.99 | 4.59 | -2.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.95 | 14.55 | -9.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GDXJ | EART | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.32 | 3.15 | -1.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.06 | 0.27 | -0.21 |
Drawdowns
GDXJ vs. EART - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GDXJ drawdown since its inception was -88.66%, which is greater than EART's maximum drawdown of -53.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDXJ and EART.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GDXJ | EART | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.66% | -53.68% | -34.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.92% | -26.03% | -6.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.92% | -37.20% | +4.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.99% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.77% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.01% | -10.88% | -18.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -60.50% | -29.15% | -31.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.19% | 8.19% | +5.00% |
Volatility
GDXJ vs. EART - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) has a higher volatility of 16.66% compared to Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF (EART) at 11.14%. This indicates that GDXJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EART based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GDXJ | EART | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.66% | 11.14% | +5.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.34% | 31.37% | +9.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.79% | 37.95% | +11.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.10% | 33.97% | +7.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.06% | 33.97% | +10.09% |
GDXJ vs. EART - Expense Ratio Comparison
GDXJ has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is lower than EART's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
GDXJ vs. EART - Dividend Comparison
GDXJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.39%, more than EART's 0.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EART Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF | 0.55% | 0.65% | 1.06% | 1.83% | 2.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GDXJ VanEck Vectors Junior Gold Miners ETF | 2.39% | 2.33% | 2.61% | 0.72% | 0.51% | 1.78% | 1.58% | 0.39% | 0.45% | 0.03% | 4.78% | 0.72% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GDXJ and EART have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GDXJ has higher volatility (16.66%) compared to EART (11.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GDXJ dropped -88.66% vs EART's -53.68%.
On 3-year performance, GDXJ leads with 46.12% vs 21.75% for EART. On fees, GDXJ is cheaper at 0.54% per year. On volatility, EART has been the lower-risk option at 11.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, GDXJ has performed better with a 46.12% return vs 21.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GDXJ is cheaper with a 0.54% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for EART.
GDXJ has the higher dividend yield at 2.39%, compared with 0.55% for EART.
GDXJ tracks MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index, while EART tracks Solactive Rare Earth & Critical Materials Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.54% for GDXJ and 0.59% for EART.
EART currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.15 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GDXJ and EART
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer