PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GDX vs. QUAL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GDX vs. QUAL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) and iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF (QUAL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GDX achieves a -8.28% return, which is significantly lower than QUAL's 7.89% return. Over the past 10 years, GDX has underperformed QUAL with an annualized return of 12.82%, while QUAL has yielded a comparatively higher 14.19% annualized return.


GDX

1D
-0.22%
1M
-16.83%
YTD
-8.28%
6M
0.10%
1Y
53.51%
3Y*
37.89%
5Y*
17.28%
10Y*
12.82%

QUAL

1D
0.32%
1M
1.62%
YTD
7.89%
6M
8.26%
1Y
19.70%
3Y*
19.43%
5Y*
11.82%
10Y*
14.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GDX vs. QUAL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GDX
VanEck Gold Miners ETF
-8.28%154.77%10.63%9.98%-9.01%-9.52%23.66%39.84%-8.77%11.99%
QUAL
iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF
7.89%12.65%22.29%30.88%-20.50%26.94%17.04%33.89%-5.70%22.26%

Correlation

The correlation between GDX and QUAL is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2013

0.16

The correlation between GDX and QUAL shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (all time) to 0.34 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

GDX vs. QUAL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GDX
QUAL

Basic Materials

100.0%
1.7%

Communication Services

-

11.1%

Consumer Cyclical

-

9.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.9%

Energy

-

4.0%

Financial Services

-

11.5%

Healthcare

-

9.0%

Industrials

-

8.2%

Real Estate

-

1.8%

Technology

-

36.5%

Utilities

-

1.9%

Basic Materials

GDX
100.0%
QUAL
1.7%

Communication Services

GDX

-

QUAL
11.1%

Consumer Cyclical

GDX

-

QUAL
9.3%

Consumer Defensive

GDX

-

QUAL
4.9%

Energy

GDX

-

QUAL
4.0%

Financial Services

GDX

-

QUAL
11.5%

Healthcare

GDX

-

QUAL
9.0%

Industrials

GDX

-

QUAL
8.2%

Real Estate

GDX

-

QUAL
1.8%

Technology

GDX

-

QUAL
36.5%

Utilities

GDX

-

QUAL
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GDX vs. QUAL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GDX
GDX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
GDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
GDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

QUAL
QUAL Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
QUAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QUAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
QUAL Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
QUAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
QUAL Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GDX vs. QUAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) and iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF (QUAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GDXQUALDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.29

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.68

2.19

-0.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.32

9.96

-5.64

GDX vs. QUAL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is comparable to the QUAL Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GDX and QUAL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GDXQUALDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.16

1.65

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

0.68

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

0.79

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.12

0.80

-0.68

Drawdowns

GDX vs. QUAL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GDX drawdown since its inception was -80.34%, which is greater than QUAL's maximum drawdown of -34.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDX and QUAL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GDXQUALDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.34%

-34.06%

-46.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.09%

-9.03%

-23.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.09%

-18.00%

-14.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.51%

-28.23%

-18.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.79%

-34.06%

-15.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-32.09%

-1.61%

-30.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.43%

-4.10%

-36.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.42%

1.98%

+10.44%

Volatility

GDX vs. QUAL - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) has a higher volatility of 16.05% compared to iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF (QUAL) at 3.12%. This indicates that GDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QUAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GDXQUALDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.05%

3.12%

+12.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.61%

9.28%

+29.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.36%

12.01%

+34.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.61%

17.35%

+19.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.27%

18.11%

+19.16%

GDX vs. QUAL - Expense Ratio Comparison

GDX has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is higher than QUAL's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

GDX vs. QUAL - Dividend Comparison

GDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, less than QUAL's 0.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GDX
VanEck Gold Miners ETF
0.80%0.74%1.19%1.61%1.66%1.67%0.53%0.67%0.50%0.76%0.26%0.85%
QUAL
iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF
0.88%0.94%1.02%1.23%1.59%1.20%1.39%1.60%2.00%1.76%1.96%1.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


GDX and QUAL have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GDX has higher volatility (16.05%) compared to QUAL (3.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GDX dropped -80.34% vs QUAL's -34.06%.

On 10-year performance, QUAL leads with 14.19% vs 12.82% for GDX. On fees, QUAL is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, QUAL has been the lower-risk option at 3.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, QUAL has performed better with a 14.19% return vs 12.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QUAL is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.51% for GDX.

QUAL has the higher dividend yield at 0.88%, compared with 0.80% for GDX.

GDX is categorized as Gold, while QUAL is Large Cap Blend Equities. GDX tracks NYSE MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index, while QUAL tracks MSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.51% for GDX and 0.15% for QUAL.

QUAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GDX and QUAL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer