GDX vs. ICSH
GDX (VanEck Gold Miners ETF) and ICSH (iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GDX is a Gold fund tracking the NYSE MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index, while ICSH is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by iShares. GDX is passively managed, while ICSH is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, GDX returned 12.82%/yr vs 2.77%/yr for ICSH. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GDX charges 0.51%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for ICSH.
Performance
GDX vs. ICSH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GDX achieves a -8.28% return, which is significantly lower than ICSH's 1.43% return. Over the past 10 years, GDX has outperformed ICSH with an annualized return of 12.82%, while ICSH has yielded a comparatively lower 2.77% annualized return.
GDX
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -16.83%
- YTD
- -8.28%
- 6M
- 0.10%
- 1Y
- 53.51%
- 3Y*
- 37.89%
- 5Y*
- 17.28%
- 10Y*
- 12.82%
ICSH
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.18%
- YTD
- 1.43%
- 6M
- 1.75%
- 1Y
- 4.30%
- 3Y*
- 5.15%
- 5Y*
- 3.67%
- 10Y*
- 2.77%
GDX vs. ICSH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDX VanEck Gold Miners ETF | -8.28% | 154.77% | 10.63% | 9.98% | -9.01% | -9.52% | 23.66% | 39.84% | -8.77% | 11.99% |
ICSH iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF | 1.43% | 4.96% | 5.52% | 5.58% | 0.97% | 0.16% | 1.61% | 3.17% | 2.25% | 1.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between GDX and ICSH is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2013 | 0.09 |
The correlation between GDX and ICSH shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (all time) to 0.22 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
GDX vs. ICSH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GDX
ICSH
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
GDX
ICSH
-
Communication Services
GDX
-
ICSH
-
Consumer Cyclical
GDX
-
ICSH
-
Consumer Defensive
GDX
-
ICSH
-
Energy
GDX
-
ICSH
-
Financial Services
GDX
-
ICSH
-
Healthcare
GDX
-
ICSH
-
Industrials
GDX
-
ICSH
-
Real Estate
GDX
-
ICSH
-
Technology
GDX
-
ICSH
-
Utilities
GDX
-
ICSH
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GDX vs. ICSH — Risk / Return Rank
GDX
ICSH
GDX vs. ICSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) and iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF (ICSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GDX | ICSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -9.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -25.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 6.56 | -5.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.68 | 43.67 | -41.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.32 | 288.81 | -284.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GDX | ICSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.16 | 11.01 | -9.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | 7.62 | -7.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 | 2.63 | -2.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.12 | 1.93 | -1.82 |
Drawdowns
GDX vs. ICSH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GDX drawdown since its inception was -80.34%, which is greater than ICSH's maximum drawdown of -3.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDX and ICSH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GDX | ICSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.34% | -3.94% | -76.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.09% | -0.10% | -31.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.09% | -0.10% | -31.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.51% | -0.73% | -45.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.79% | -3.94% | -45.85% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.09% | -0.02% | -32.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.43% | -0.08% | -40.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.42% | 0.01% | +12.41% |
Volatility
GDX vs. ICSH - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) has a higher volatility of 16.05% compared to iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF (ICSH) at 0.15%. This indicates that GDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ICSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GDX | ICSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.05% | 0.15% | +15.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.61% | 0.30% | +38.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.36% | 0.39% | +45.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.61% | 0.48% | +36.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.27% | 1.06% | +36.21% |
GDX vs. ICSH - Expense Ratio Comparison
GDX has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is higher than ICSH's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
GDX vs. ICSH - Dividend Comparison
GDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, less than ICSH's 4.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDX VanEck Gold Miners ETF | 0.80% | 0.74% | 1.19% | 1.61% | 1.66% | 1.67% | 0.53% | 0.67% | 0.50% | 0.76% | 0.26% | 0.85% |
ICSH iShares Ultra Short Duration Bond Active ETF | 4.34% | 4.55% | 5.24% | 4.78% | 1.66% | 0.42% | 1.21% | 2.61% | 2.20% | 1.36% | 0.88% | 0.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GDX and ICSH have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GDX has higher volatility (16.05%) compared to ICSH (0.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GDX dropped -80.34% vs ICSH's -3.94%.
On 10-year performance, GDX leads with 12.82% vs 2.77% for ICSH. On fees, ICSH is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, ICSH has been the lower-risk option at 0.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, GDX has performed better with a 12.82% return vs 2.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ICSH is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.51% for GDX.
ICSH has the higher dividend yield at 4.34%, compared with 0.80% for GDX.
GDX is categorized as Gold, while ICSH is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.51% for GDX and 0.08% for ICSH.
ICSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (11.01 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GDX and ICSH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer