PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GDX vs. HBM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GDX vs. HBM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) and Hudbay Minerals Inc. (HBM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GDX achieves a -6.69% return, which is significantly lower than HBM's 40.23% return. Over the past 10 years, GDX has underperformed HBM with an annualized return of 13.29%, while HBM has yielded a comparatively higher 19.31% annualized return.


GDX

1D
2.97%
1M
-16.83%
YTD
-6.69%
6M
-5.89%
1Y
50.59%
3Y*
38.96%
5Y*
17.51%
10Y*
13.29%

HBM

1D
4.43%
1M
0.32%
YTD
40.23%
6M
49.02%
1Y
189.83%
3Y*
78.89%
5Y*
31.42%
10Y*
19.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GDX vs. HBM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GDX
VanEck Gold Miners ETF
-6.69%154.77%10.63%9.98%-9.01%-9.52%23.66%39.84%-8.77%11.99%
HBM
Hudbay Minerals Inc.
40.23%145.46%47.03%9.24%-29.87%3.82%69.50%-11.77%-46.20%54.77%

Correlation

The correlation between GDX and HBM is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2009

0.43

Over the past year, GDX and HBM have become more correlated (0.69) than their long-term average of 0.43, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GDX vs. HBM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GDX
GDX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
GDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
GDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

HBM
HBM Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
HBM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HBM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
HBM Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
HBM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
HBM Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GDX vs. HBM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) and Hudbay Minerals Inc. (HBM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GDXHBMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.44

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.40

5.28

-3.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.87

16.41

-12.54

GDX vs. HBM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is lower than the HBM Sharpe Ratio of 3.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GDX and HBM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GDX vs. HBM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GDX drawdown since its inception was -80.34%, smaller than the maximum HBM drawdown of -92.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDX and HBM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GDXHBMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.34%

-92.21%

+11.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.28%

-36.16%

-0.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.28%

-41.11%

+4.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.51%

-63.33%

+16.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.79%

-86.34%

+36.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-30.91%

-12.68%

-18.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.41%

-52.45%

+12.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.11%

11.62%

+1.49%

Volatility

GDX vs. HBM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) is 17.20%, while Hudbay Minerals Inc. (HBM) has a volatility of 25.87%. This indicates that GDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HBM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GDXHBMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.20%

25.87%

-8.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.15%

47.72%

-8.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.89%

59.13%

-12.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.74%

55.51%

-18.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.34%

58.82%

-21.48%

Dividends

GDX vs. HBM - Dividend Comparison

GDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, more than HBM's 0.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GDX
VanEck Gold Miners ETF
0.79%0.74%1.19%1.61%1.66%1.67%0.53%0.67%0.50%0.76%0.26%0.85%
HBM
Hudbay Minerals Inc.
0.08%0.07%0.17%0.31%0.32%0.22%0.21%0.36%0.38%0.23%0.35%0.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


GDX and HBM have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HBM has higher volatility (25.87%) compared to GDX (17.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GDX dropped -80.34% vs HBM's -92.21%.

HBM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.23 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GDX and HBM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer