GDX vs. COST

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

GDX (VanEck Gold Miners ETF) is Gold fund tracking the NYSE MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index, while COST (Costco Wholesale Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, GDX returned 13.29%/yr vs 22.27%/yr for COST. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

GDX vs. COST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GDX achieves a -6.69% return, which is significantly lower than COST's 14.24% return. Over the past 10 years, GDX has underperformed COST with an annualized return of 13.29%, while COST has yielded a comparatively higher 22.27% annualized return.

GDX

• 1D: 2.97%
• 1M: -14.82%
• YTD: -6.69%
• 6M: -5.89%
• 1Y: 48.02%
• 3Y*: 38.96%
• 5Y*: 17.51%
• 10Y*: 13.29%

COST

• 1D: 0.68%
• 1M: -6.35%
• YTD: 14.24%
• 6M: 11.38%
• 1Y: -0.24%
• 3Y*: 25.12%
• 5Y*: 22.12%
• 10Y*: 22.27%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GDX vs. COST - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GDX VanEck Gold Miners ETF	-6.69%	154.77%	10.63%	9.98%	-9.01%	-9.52%	23.66%	39.84%	-8.77%	11.99%
COST Costco Wholesale Corporation	14.24%	-5.39%	39.62%	49.00%	-19.05%	51.82%	32.67%	45.70%	10.60%	22.37%

Correlation

The correlation between GDX and COST is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.07
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.07
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.11
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.09
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2006	0.10

The correlation between GDX and COST shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.11 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

GDX vs. COST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GDX

GDX Risk / Return Rank: 33
GDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
GDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
GDX Omega Ratio Rank: 36
GDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
GDX Martin Ratio Rank: 30

COST

COST Risk / Return Rank: 37
COST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
COST Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
COST Omega Ratio Rank: 32
COST Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
COST Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GDX vs. COST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GDX	COST	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.09	-0.08	+1.17
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.51	0.02	+1.49
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.00	+0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.40	-0.10	+1.50
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.87	-0.22	+4.09

GDX vs. COST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is higher than the COST Sharpe Ratio of -0.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GDX and COST, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GDX vs. COST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GDX drawdown since its inception was -80.34%, which is greater than COST's maximum drawdown of -53.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDX and COST.

Drawdown Indicators

	GDX	COST	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-80.34%	-53.39%	-26.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-36.28%	-15.14%	-21.14%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-36.28%	-20.74%	-15.54%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-46.51%	-31.40%	-15.11%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-49.79%	-31.40%	-18.39%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-30.91%	-10.23%	-20.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-40.41%	-13.36%	-27.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.11%	6.67%	+6.44%

Volatility

GDX vs. COST - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) has a higher volatility of 17.20% compared to Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) at 7.44%. This indicates that GDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GDX	COST	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.20%	7.44%	+9.76%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	39.15%	14.53%	+24.62%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	46.89%	18.80%	+28.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	36.74%	22.72%	+14.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	37.34%	21.95%	+15.39%

Dividends

GDX vs. COST - Dividend Comparison

GDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, more than COST's 0.55% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
COST Costco Wholesale Corporation	0.55%	0.59%	0.49%	2.87%	0.76%	0.54%	3.38%	0.86%	1.08%	4.81%	1.09%	4.06%
GDX VanEck Gold Miners ETF	0.79%	0.74%	1.19%	1.61%	1.66%	1.67%	0.53%	0.67%	0.50%	0.76%	0.26%	0.85%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GDX and COST in my portfolio?

GDX and COST have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GDX or COST?

GDX has higher volatility (17.20%) compared to COST (7.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GDX dropped -80.34% vs COST's -53.39%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.09 vs -0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.