PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GDV vs. SVAAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GDV vs. SVAAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Gabelli Dividend and Income Trust (GDV) and Federated Hermes Strategic Value Dividend Fund Class A (SVAAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GDV achieves a 7.28% return, which is significantly lower than SVAAX's 8.72% return. Over the past 10 years, GDV has outperformed SVAAX with an annualized return of 10.95%, while SVAAX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.83% annualized return.


GDV

1D
-0.58%
1M
0.10%
YTD
7.28%
6M
9.81%
1Y
24.13%
3Y*
19.59%
5Y*
8.32%
10Y*
10.95%

SVAAX

1D
0.44%
1M
-0.20%
YTD
8.72%
6M
8.60%
1Y
18.89%
3Y*
15.08%
5Y*
10.02%
10Y*
7.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GDV vs. SVAAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GDV
The Gabelli Dividend and Income Trust
7.28%22.83%18.14%11.93%-18.61%32.83%4.89%27.73%-17.13%24.19%
SVAAX
Federated Hermes Strategic Value Dividend Fund Class A
8.72%14.42%16.29%-2.07%8.07%21.36%-8.15%19.42%-8.44%14.69%

Correlation

The correlation between GDV and SVAAX is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2006

0.64

Over the past year, the correlation between GDV and SVAAX has dropped to 0.34 - well below their long-term average of 0.64, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GDV vs. SVAAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GDV
GDV Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
GDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDV Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
GDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDV Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

SVAAX
SVAAX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
SVAAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SVAAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
SVAAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
SVAAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
SVAAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GDV vs. SVAAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Gabelli Dividend and Income Trust (GDV) and Federated Hermes Strategic Value Dividend Fund Class A (SVAAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GDVSVAAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.39

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.49

5.06

-2.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.72

13.74

-3.01

GDV vs. SVAAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GDV Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is comparable to the SVAAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GDV and SVAAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GDVSVAAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.09

2.32

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.77

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

0.52

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.48

-0.10

Drawdowns

GDV vs. SVAAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GDV drawdown since its inception was -68.88%, which is greater than SVAAX's maximum drawdown of -51.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDV and SVAAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GDVSVAAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.88%

-51.16%

-17.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.75%

-4.71%

-5.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.07%

-12.84%

-3.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.33%

-16.17%

-12.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.09%

-36.47%

-16.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.09%

-3.33%

+2.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.30%

-8.21%

-1.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.26%

2.60%

-0.34%

Volatility

GDV vs. SVAAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for The Gabelli Dividend and Income Trust (GDV) is 2.34%, while Federated Hermes Strategic Value Dividend Fund Class A (SVAAX) has a volatility of 3.60%. This indicates that GDV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SVAAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GDVSVAAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.34%

3.60%

-1.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.66%

7.37%

+1.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.61%

10.30%

+1.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.87%

13.65%

+3.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.65%

15.39%

+6.26%

GDV vs. SVAAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GDV has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than SVAAX's 1.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

GDV vs. SVAAX - Dividend Comparison

GDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.96%, more than SVAAX's 5.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GDV
The Gabelli Dividend and Income Trust
5.96%6.05%5.47%6.10%6.84%5.11%6.15%6.01%7.21%5.64%6.59%6.72%
SVAAX
Federated Hermes Strategic Value Dividend Fund Class A
5.88%5.80%7.38%4.10%9.49%3.50%4.06%8.55%8.39%10.16%5.00%8.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


GDV and SVAAX have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SVAAX has higher volatility (3.60%) compared to GDV (2.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GDV dropped -68.88% vs SVAAX's -51.16%.

SVAAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GDV and SVAAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer