GDV vs. HTD
Compare and contrast key facts about The Gabelli Dividend and Income Trust (GDV) and John Hancock Tax-Advantaged Dividend Income Fund (HTD).
GDV is managed by Gabelli Funds. It was launched on Nov 28, 2003. HTD is managed by John Hancock. It was launched on Feb 25, 2004.
Performance
GDV vs. HTD - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GDV vs. HTD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDV The Gabelli Dividend and Income Trust | -1.47% | 22.83% | 18.14% | 11.93% | -18.61% | 32.83% | 4.89% | 27.73% | -17.13% | 24.19% |
HTD John Hancock Tax-Advantaged Dividend Income Fund | 6.73% | 15.87% | 25.68% | -9.92% | -6.24% | 32.36% | -16.54% | 42.77% | -9.13% | 16.47% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GDV achieves a -1.47% return, which is significantly lower than HTD's 6.73% return. Over the past 10 years, GDV has outperformed HTD with an annualized return of 10.53%, while HTD has yielded a comparatively lower 8.93% annualized return.
GDV
- 1D
- 2.75%
- 1M
- -6.21%
- YTD
- -1.47%
- 6M
- 2.43%
- 1Y
- 19.06%
- 3Y*
- 16.02%
- 5Y*
- 8.77%
- 10Y*
- 10.53%
HTD
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- -3.65%
- YTD
- 6.73%
- 6M
- 3.81%
- 1Y
- 11.75%
- 3Y*
- 13.83%
- 5Y*
- 8.97%
- 10Y*
- 8.93%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GDV vs. HTD - Expense Ratio Comparison
GDV has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is higher than HTD's 0.01% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
GDV vs. HTD — Risk / Return Rank
GDV
HTD
GDV vs. HTD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Gabelli Dividend and Income Trust (GDV) and John Hancock Tax-Advantaged Dividend Income Fund (HTD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GDV | HTD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.10 | 0.74 | +0.37 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.54 | 1.03 | +0.51 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.15 | +0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.43 | 0.94 | +0.49 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.39 | 3.63 | +2.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GDV | HTD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.10 | 0.74 | +0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | 0.51 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | 0.39 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.42 | -0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between GDV and HTD is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
GDV vs. HTD - Dividend Comparison
GDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.35%, less than HTD's 7.41% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDV The Gabelli Dividend and Income Trust | 6.35% | 6.05% | 5.47% | 6.10% | 6.84% | 5.11% | 6.15% | 6.01% | 7.21% | 5.64% | 6.59% | 6.72% |
HTD John Hancock Tax-Advantaged Dividend Income Fund | 7.41% | 7.51% | 7.52% | 8.73% | 7.36% | 5.80% | 7.97% | 6.06% | 10.09% | 8.85% | 7.30% | 7.06% |
Drawdowns
GDV vs. HTD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GDV drawdown since its inception was -68.88%, roughly equal to the maximum HTD drawdown of -69.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDV and HTD.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GDV | HTD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.88% | -69.79% | +0.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.38% | -13.27% | -0.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.33% | -31.58% | +3.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.09% | -56.57% | +3.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.20% | -3.65% | -3.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.36% | -8.86% | -0.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.99% | 3.44% | -0.45% |
Volatility
GDV vs. HTD - Volatility Comparison
The Gabelli Dividend and Income Trust (GDV) has a higher volatility of 5.83% compared to John Hancock Tax-Advantaged Dividend Income Fund (HTD) at 4.59%. This indicates that GDV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HTD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GDV | HTD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.83% | 4.59% | +1.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.06% | 9.56% | -0.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.35% | 16.06% | +1.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.93% | 17.71% | -0.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.66% | 22.71% | -1.05% |