GDT vs. WIMA
GDT (WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund) and WIMA (WisdomTree International Adaptive Moving Average Fund) are both Tactical Allocation funds from WisdomTree. GDT is actively managed, while WIMA is passively managed. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GDT charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for WIMA.
Performance
GDT vs. WIMA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GDT
- 1D
- -0.85%
- 1M
- -1.71%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WIMA
- 1D
- -0.77%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GDT vs. WIMA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
GDT WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund | -4.93% |
WIMA WisdomTree International Adaptive Moving Average Fund | -0.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between GDT and WIMA is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2026 | 0.61 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GDT vs. WIMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund (GDT) and WisdomTree International Adaptive Moving Average Fund (WIMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GDT | WIMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.63 | -0.12 | -0.50 |
Drawdowns
GDT vs. WIMA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GDT drawdown since its inception was -18.06%, which is greater than WIMA's maximum drawdown of -2.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDT and WIMA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GDT | WIMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.06% | -2.75% | -15.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.07% | -0.77% | -15.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.90% | -0.95% | -8.95% |
Volatility
GDT vs. WIMA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GDT | WIMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.36% | 13.54% | +19.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.36% | 13.54% | +19.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.36% | 13.54% | +19.82% |
GDT vs. WIMA - Expense Ratio Comparison
GDT has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than WIMA's 0.42% expense ratio.
Dividends
GDT vs. WIMA - Dividend Comparison
GDT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%, while WIMA has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
GDT WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund | 1.77% |
WIMA WisdomTree International Adaptive Moving Average Fund | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GDT and WIMA have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GDT is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GDT is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for WIMA.
GDT has the higher dividend yield at 1.77%, compared with 0.00% for WIMA.
Their fees differ too: 0.30% for GDT and 0.42% for WIMA.
Find the right allocation for GDT and WIMA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer