GDT vs. THRO
GDT (WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund) and THRO (iShares U.S. Thematic Rotation Active ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GDT charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for THRO.
Performance
GDT vs. THRO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GDT
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- -2.50%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
THRO
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- 1.38%
- 6M
- 10.28%
- YTD
- 12.29%
- 1Y
- 21.59%
- 3Y*
- 21.79%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GDT vs. THRO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
GDT WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund | -14.24% |
THRO iShares U.S. Thematic Rotation Active ETF | 12.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between GDT and THRO is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2026 | 0.42 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GDT vs. THRO — Risk / Return Rank
GDT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
THRO
GDT vs. THRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund (GDT) and iShares U.S. Thematic Rotation Active ETF (THRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GDT | THRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.27 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.94 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.22 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GDT vs. THRO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GDT drawdown since its inception was -24.66%, smaller than the maximum THRO drawdown of -26.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDT and THRO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GDT | THRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.66% | -26.54% | +1.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.87% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.43% | -0.99% | -21.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.26% | -6.59% | -5.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.56% | — |
Volatility
GDT vs. THRO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GDT | THRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.09% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.36% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.91% | 14.00% | +17.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.91% | 18.72% | +13.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.91% | 18.72% | +13.19% |
GDT vs. THRO - Expense Ratio Comparison
GDT has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than THRO's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
GDT vs. THRO - Dividend Comparison
GDT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.70%, more than THRO's 0.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDT WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund | 2.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
THRO iShares U.S. Thematic Rotation Active ETF | 0.25% | 0.15% | 0.73% | 0.55% | 0.90% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GDT and THRO have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GDT is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GDT is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for THRO.
GDT has the higher dividend yield at 2.70%, compared with 0.25% for THRO.
They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for GDT and 0.60% for THRO.
Find the right allocation for GDT and THRO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer