GDT vs. TACK
GDT (WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund) and TACK (Fairlead Tactical Sector Fund) are both Tactical Allocation funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GDT charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.76%/yr for TACK.
Performance
GDT vs. TACK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GDT
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- -2.50%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TACK
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- 0.60%
- 6M
- 4.78%
- YTD
- 6.67%
- 1Y
- 13.60%
- 3Y*
- 11.68%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GDT vs. TACK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
GDT WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund | -14.24% |
TACK Fairlead Tactical Sector Fund | 4.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between GDT and TACK is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2026 | 0.48 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GDT vs. TACK — Risk / Return Rank
GDT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TACK
GDT vs. TACK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund (GDT) and Fairlead Tactical Sector Fund (TACK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GDT | TACK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.23 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.25 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 7.03 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GDT vs. TACK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GDT drawdown since its inception was -24.66%, which is greater than TACK's maximum drawdown of -14.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDT and TACK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GDT | TACK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.66% | -14.49% | -10.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.49% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.43% | -0.31% | -22.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.26% | -4.15% | -8.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.87% | — |
Volatility
GDT vs. TACK - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GDT | TACK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.77% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.34% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.91% | 9.64% | +22.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.91% | 11.20% | +20.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.91% | 11.20% | +20.71% |
GDT vs. TACK - Expense Ratio Comparison
GDT has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than TACK's 0.76% expense ratio.
Dividends
GDT vs. TACK - Dividend Comparison
GDT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.70%, more than TACK's 1.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDT WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund | 2.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TACK Fairlead Tactical Sector Fund | 1.30% | 1.18% | 1.26% | 1.29% | 0.89% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GDT and TACK have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GDT is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GDT is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.76% for TACK.
GDT has the higher dividend yield at 2.70%, compared with 1.30% for TACK.
They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Fairlead. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for GDT and 0.76% for TACK.
Find the right allocation for GDT and TACK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer