GDT vs. MLPB
GDT (WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund) and MLPB (ETRACS Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index ETN Series B) are both exchange-traded funds - GDT is a Tactical Allocation fund actively managed by WisdomTree, while MLPB is a MLPs fund tracking the Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index. GDT is actively managed, while MLPB is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions. GDT charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for MLPB.
Performance
GDT vs. MLPB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GDT
- 1D
- -1.65%
- 1M
- -7.70%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MLPB
- 1D
- 1.47%
- 1M
- 6.90%
- 6M
- 16.96%
- YTD
- 23.17%
- 1Y
- 24.66%
- 3Y*
- 22.00%
- 5Y*
- 21.74%
- 10Y*
- 8.59%
GDT vs. MLPB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
GDT WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund | -16.63% |
MLPB ETRACS Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index ETN Series B | 17.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between GDT and MLPB is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2026 | -0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GDT vs. MLPB — Risk / Return Rank
GDT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
MLPB
GDT vs. MLPB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund (GDT) and ETRACS Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index ETN Series B (MLPB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GDT | MLPB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.30 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.56 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.65 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GDT vs. MLPB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GDT drawdown since its inception was -24.66%, smaller than the maximum MLPB drawdown of -71.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDT and MLPB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GDT | MLPB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.66% | -71.93% | +47.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.49% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -20.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -71.93% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.60% | -1.95% | -22.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.64% | -14.72% | +2.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.72% | — |
Volatility
GDT vs. MLPB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GDT | MLPB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.60% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.97% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.69% | 14.27% | +17.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.69% | 19.85% | +11.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.69% | 27.19% | +4.50% |
GDT vs. MLPB - Expense Ratio Comparison
GDT has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than MLPB's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
GDT vs. MLPB - Dividend Comparison
GDT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.78%, less than MLPB's 5.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDT WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund | 2.78% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MLPB ETRACS Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index ETN Series B | 5.86% | 6.51% | 5.95% | 6.37% | 6.00% | 6.98% | 11.93% | 7.98% | 8.11% | 7.23% | 6.85% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GDT and MLPB have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GDT is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GDT is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for MLPB.
MLPB has the higher dividend yield at 5.86%, compared with 2.78% for GDT.
GDT is categorized as Tactical Allocation, while MLPB is MLPs. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for GDT and 0.85% for MLPB.
Find the right allocation for GDT and MLPB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer