GDT vs. GDMN

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GDT (WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund) and GDMN (WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - GDT is a Tactical Allocation fund actively managed by WisdomTree, while GDMN is a Commodities fund actively managed by WisdomTree. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GDT charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for GDMN.

Performance

GDT vs. GDMN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund (GDT) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

GDT

• 1D: -0.85%
• 1M: -1.71%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GDMN

• 1D: -3.68%
• 1M: -2.43%
• YTD: -4.13%
• 6M: 2.73%
• 1Y: 76.93%
• 3Y*: 60.95%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GDT vs. GDMN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
GDT WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund	-8.05%
GDMN WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund	-27.40%

Correlation

The correlation between GDT and GDMN is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2026	0.92

Return for Risk

GDT vs. GDMN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GDMN

GDMN Risk / Return Rank: 34
GDMN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
GDMN Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
GDMN Omega Ratio Rank: 36
GDMN Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
GDMN Martin Ratio Rank: 31

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GDT vs. GDMN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund (GDT) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GDT	GDMN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.26	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.63	0.80	-1.43

Drawdowns

GDT vs. GDMN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GDT drawdown since its inception was -18.06%, smaller than the maximum GDMN drawdown of -52.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDT and GDMN.

Drawdown Indicators

	GDT	GDMN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.06%	-52.82%	+34.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-39.03%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-39.03%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-16.07%	-37.06%	+20.99%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.90%	-18.89%	+8.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	16.51%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GDT	GDMN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	17.94%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	51.79%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	33.36%	61.32%	-27.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.36%	47.59%	-14.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.36%	47.59%	-14.23%

GDT vs. GDMN - Expense Ratio Comparison

GDT has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than GDMN's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

GDT vs. GDMN - Dividend Comparison

GDT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%, less than GDMN's 2.82% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
GDMN WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund	2.82%	2.70%	9.44%	7.69%	1.44%
GDT WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund	1.77%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GDT and GDMN in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, GDT and GDMN move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, GDT or GDMN?

On fees, GDT is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GDT or GDMN?

GDT is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for GDMN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GDT or GDMN?

GDMN has the higher dividend yield at 2.82%, compared with 1.77% for GDT.

What is the main difference between GDT and GDMN?

GDT is categorized as Tactical Allocation, while GDMN is Commodities. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for GDT and 0.45% for GDMN.