GDT vs. GDMN
GDT (WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund) and GDMN (WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - GDT is a Tactical Allocation fund actively managed by WisdomTree, while GDMN is a Commodities fund actively managed by WisdomTree. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GDT charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for GDMN.
Performance
GDT vs. GDMN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GDT
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- -2.50%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GDMN
- 1D
- -0.60%
- 1M
- -7.79%
- 6M
- -28.34%
- YTD
- -20.49%
- 1Y
- 49.31%
- 3Y*
- 53.76%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GDT vs. GDMN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
GDT WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund | -14.24% |
GDMN WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund | -37.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between GDT and GDMN is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2026 | 0.93 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GDT vs. GDMN — Risk / Return Rank
GDT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
GDMN
GDT vs. GDMN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund (GDT) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GDT | GDMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.19 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.08 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 2.47 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GDT vs. GDMN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GDT drawdown since its inception was -24.66%, smaller than the maximum GDMN drawdown of -52.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDT and GDMN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GDT | GDMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.66% | -52.82% | +28.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -49.72% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -49.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.43% | -47.81% | +25.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.26% | -19.44% | +7.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 21.66% | — |
Volatility
GDT vs. GDMN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GDT | GDMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 20.59% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 54.69% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.91% | 64.39% | -32.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.91% | 48.29% | -16.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.91% | 48.29% | -16.38% |
GDT vs. GDMN - Expense Ratio Comparison
GDT has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than GDMN's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
GDT vs. GDMN - Dividend Comparison
GDT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.70%, less than GDMN's 3.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDMN WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund | 3.40% | 2.70% | 9.44% | 7.69% | 1.44% |
GDT WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund | 2.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, GDT and GDMN move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, GDT is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GDT is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for GDMN.
GDMN has the higher dividend yield at 3.40%, compared with 2.70% for GDT.
GDT is categorized as Tactical Allocation, while GDMN is Commodities. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for GDT and 0.45% for GDMN.
Find the right allocation for GDT and GDMN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer