GDT vs. ALLW

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

GDT (WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund) and ALLW (State Street Bridgewater All Weather ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GDT charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for ALLW.

Performance

GDT vs. ALLW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund (GDT) and State Street Bridgewater All Weather ETF (ALLW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

GDT

• 1D: -0.42%
• 1M: -2.50%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ALLW

• 1D: 0.17%
• 1M: -0.65%
• 6M: 3.83%
• YTD: 6.55%
• 1Y: 18.13%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GDT vs. ALLW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
GDT WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund	-14.24%
ALLW State Street Bridgewater All Weather ETF	2.31%

Correlation

The correlation between GDT and ALLW is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2026	0.75

Return for Risk

GDT vs. ALLW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GDT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ALLW

ALLW Risk / Return Rank: 60
ALLW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
ALLW Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
ALLW Omega Ratio Rank: 60
ALLW Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
ALLW Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GDT vs. ALLW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund (GDT) and State Street Bridgewater All Weather ETF (ALLW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GDT	ALLW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.61	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.18	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.29	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.46	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	9.10	—

Drawdowns

GDT vs. ALLW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GDT drawdown since its inception was -24.66%, which is greater than ALLW's maximum drawdown of -8.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDT and ALLW.

Drawdown Indicators

	GDT	ALLW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.66%	-8.78%	-15.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-7.23%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-22.43%	-3.21%	-19.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.26%	-1.33%	-10.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.95%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GDT	ALLW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.32%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	9.25%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.91%	11.06%	+20.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.91%	12.57%	+19.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	31.91%	12.57%	+19.34%

GDT vs. ALLW - Expense Ratio Comparison

GDT has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than ALLW's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

GDT vs. ALLW - Dividend Comparison

GDT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.70%, less than ALLW's 4.39% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
ALLW State Street Bridgewater All Weather ETF	4.39%	4.67%
GDT WisdomTree Efficient TIPS Plus Gold Fund	2.70%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GDT and ALLW in my portfolio?

GDT and ALLW have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, GDT or ALLW?

On fees, GDT is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GDT or ALLW?

GDT is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for ALLW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GDT or ALLW?

ALLW has the higher dividend yield at 4.39%, compared with 2.70% for GDT.

What is the main difference between GDT and ALLW?

They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for GDT and 0.85% for ALLW.