PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GDOC vs. GVIP
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GDOC vs. GVIP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF (GDOC) and Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF (GVIP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

GDOC vs. GVIP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
GDOC
Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF
-8.12%10.74%-1.66%4.60%-17.12%-2.77%
GVIP
Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF
-5.92%25.27%29.82%39.15%-31.95%-2.08%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GDOC achieves a -8.12% return, which is significantly lower than GVIP's -5.92% return.


GDOC

1D
2.76%
1M
-5.94%
YTD
-8.12%
6M
2.88%
1Y
1.53%
3Y*
0.66%
5Y*
10Y*

GVIP

1D
4.35%
1M
-6.82%
YTD
-5.92%
6M
-4.60%
1Y
24.04%
3Y*
24.28%
5Y*
8.97%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GDOC vs. GVIP - Expense Ratio Comparison

GDOC has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than GVIP's 0.45% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

GDOC vs. GVIP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GDOC
GDOC Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
GDOC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDOC Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDOC Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
GDOC Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDOC Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

GVIP
GVIP Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
GVIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GVIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
GVIP Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
GVIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
GVIP Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GDOC vs. GVIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF (GDOC) and Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF (GVIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GDOCGVIPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.08

1.04

-0.95

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.25

1.55

-1.30

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.22

-0.19

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.10

1.76

-1.66

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.31

6.94

-6.63

GDOC vs. GVIP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GDOC Sharpe Ratio is 0.08, which is lower than the GVIP Sharpe Ratio of 1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GDOC and GVIP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GDOCGVIPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

1.04

-0.95

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.20

0.71

-0.92

Correlation

The correlation between GDOC and GVIP is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

GDOC vs. GVIP - Dividend Comparison

GDOC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, less than GVIP's 0.36% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
GDOC
Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF
0.35%0.32%0.02%0.55%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GVIP
Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF
0.36%0.34%0.29%0.77%0.02%0.00%0.12%0.77%0.44%0.45%0.08%

Drawdowns

GDOC vs. GVIP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GDOC drawdown since its inception was -31.01%, smaller than the maximum GVIP drawdown of -37.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDOC and GVIP.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


GDOCGVIPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.01%

-37.09%

+6.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.57%

-13.67%

-0.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.86%

-9.91%

-5.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.90%

-7.71%

-8.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.96%

3.47%

+1.49%

Volatility

GDOC vs. GVIP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF (GDOC) is 6.04%, while Goldman Sachs Hedge Industry VIP ETF (GVIP) has a volatility of 8.62%. This indicates that GDOC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GVIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


GDOCGVIPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.04%

8.62%

-2.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.22%

14.52%

-3.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.63%

23.32%

-4.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.83%

21.19%

-2.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.83%

21.68%

-2.85%