PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GDMYX vs. GMFZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GDMYX vs. GMFZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GuideStone Funds Defensive Market Strategies Fund (GDMYX) and GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2045 Fund (GMFZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GDMYX achieves a 6.31% return, which is significantly lower than GMFZX's 10.51% return. Over the past 10 years, GDMYX has underperformed GMFZX with an annualized return of 5.70%, while GMFZX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.95% annualized return.


GDMYX

1D
0.08%
1M
3.49%
YTD
6.31%
6M
6.52%
1Y
16.04%
3Y*
11.73%
5Y*
2.77%
10Y*
5.70%

GMFZX

1D
0.28%
1M
4.61%
YTD
10.51%
6M
11.20%
1Y
24.12%
3Y*
17.65%
5Y*
9.16%
10Y*
10.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GDMYX vs. GMFZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GDMYX
GuideStone Funds Defensive Market Strategies Fund
6.31%10.46%11.71%11.43%-25.87%12.14%10.04%19.79%-2.69%11.51%
GMFZX
GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2045 Fund
10.51%18.22%14.21%18.70%-17.40%16.30%13.82%24.26%-7.79%20.91%

Correlation

The correlation between GDMYX and GMFZX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2012

0.92

The correlation between GDMYX and GMFZX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GDMYX vs. GMFZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GDMYX
GDMYX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
GDMYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDMYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDMYX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
GDMYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDMYX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

GMFZX
GMFZX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
GMFZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GMFZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
GMFZX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
GMFZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
GMFZX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GDMYX vs. GMFZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuideStone Funds Defensive Market Strategies Fund (GDMYX) and GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2045 Fund (GMFZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GDMYXGMFZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.41

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.77

2.85

-0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.47

12.75

+0.72

GDMYX vs. GMFZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GDMYX Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is comparable to the GMFZX Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GDMYX and GMFZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GDMYXGMFZXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.24

2.26

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

0.68

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

0.76

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.37

+0.16

Drawdowns

GDMYX vs. GMFZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GDMYX drawdown since its inception was -29.89%, smaller than the maximum GMFZX drawdown of -60.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDMYX and GMFZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GDMYXGMFZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.89%

-60.03%

+30.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.95%

-8.59%

+2.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.58%

-14.13%

-2.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.89%

-24.61%

-5.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.89%

-30.18%

+0.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.69%

-9.66%

+3.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.22%

1.91%

-0.69%

Volatility

GDMYX vs. GMFZX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GuideStone Funds Defensive Market Strategies Fund (GDMYX) is 1.59%, while GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2045 Fund (GMFZX) has a volatility of 3.22%. This indicates that GDMYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GMFZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GDMYXGMFZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.59%

3.22%

-1.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.67%

8.61%

-2.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.37%

10.83%

-3.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.42%

13.53%

-1.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.24%

14.41%

-2.17%

GDMYX vs. GMFZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GDMYX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than GMFZX's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

GDMYX vs. GMFZX - Dividend Comparison

GDMYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.61%, more than GMFZX's 4.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GDMYX
GuideStone Funds Defensive Market Strategies Fund
9.61%10.22%10.00%2.28%0.00%10.65%3.09%5.76%5.36%4.63%0.00%0.00%
GMFZX
GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2045 Fund
4.07%4.50%5.87%3.27%6.81%5.46%2.36%3.33%7.99%4.37%3.97%19.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, GDMYX and GMFZX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

GMFZX has higher volatility (3.22%) compared to GDMYX (1.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GDMYX dropped -29.89% vs GMFZX's -60.03%.

GMFZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GDMYX and GMFZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer