GDMA vs. VCAR
GDMA (Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF) and VCAR (Simplify Volt RoboCar Disruption and Tech ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GDMA is a Hedge Fund fund actively managed by Gadsden, while VCAR is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund actively managed by Simplify. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, GDMA returned 7.66%/yr vs 14.14%/yr for VCAR. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GDMA charges 0.77%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for VCAR.
Performance
GDMA vs. VCAR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GDMA achieves a 11.18% return, which is significantly higher than VCAR's 0.60% return.
GDMA
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- 1.83%
- YTD
- 11.18%
- 6M
- 14.08%
- 1Y
- 32.26%
- 3Y*
- 16.91%
- 5Y*
- 7.66%
- 10Y*
- —
VCAR
- 1D
- -2.63%
- 1M
- 23.98%
- YTD
- 0.60%
- 6M
- -18.80%
- 1Y
- -14.28%
- 3Y*
- 33.50%
- 5Y*
- 14.14%
- 10Y*
- —
GDMA vs. VCAR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDMA Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF | 11.18% | 25.29% | 7.44% | 1.72% | -2.08% | 3.95% | 0.96% |
VCAR Simplify Volt RoboCar Disruption and Tech ETF | 0.60% | -14.73% | 152.27% | 58.33% | -61.11% | 18.52% | 4.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between GDMA and VCAR is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2020 | 0.28 |
The correlation between GDMA and VCAR shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (5 years) to 0.41 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
GDMA vs. VCAR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GDMA
VCAR
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
GDMA
VCAR
-
Financial Services
GDMA
VCAR
-
Industrials
GDMA
VCAR
-
Energy
GDMA
VCAR
-
Basic Materials
GDMA
VCAR
-
Consumer Cyclical
GDMA
VCAR
Communication Services
GDMA
VCAR
-
Healthcare
GDMA
VCAR
-
Consumer Defensive
GDMA
VCAR
-
Utilities
GDMA
VCAR
-
Real Estate
GDMA
VCAR
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GDMA vs. VCAR — Risk / Return Rank
GDMA
VCAR
GDMA vs. VCAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF (GDMA) and Simplify Volt RoboCar Disruption and Tech ETF (VCAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GDMA | VCAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.00 | +0.46 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.30 | -0.26 | +4.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.92 | -0.46 | +12.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GDMA | VCAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.47 | -0.25 | +2.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 | 0.28 | +0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.89 | 0.20 | +0.69 |
Drawdowns
GDMA vs. VCAR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GDMA drawdown since its inception was -16.66%, smaller than the maximum VCAR drawdown of -69.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDMA and VCAR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GDMA | VCAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.66% | -69.11% | +52.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.53% | -56.12% | +48.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.53% | -56.12% | +48.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.74% | -69.11% | +56.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.06% | -37.58% | +36.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.78% | -37.70% | +33.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.71% | 31.22% | -28.51% |
Volatility
GDMA vs. VCAR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF (GDMA) is 6.18%, while Simplify Volt RoboCar Disruption and Tech ETF (VCAR) has a volatility of 24.38%. This indicates that GDMA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VCAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GDMA | VCAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.18% | 24.38% | -18.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.03% | 41.08% | -31.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.12% | 56.90% | -43.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.67% | 50.69% | -41.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.97% | 50.02% | -39.05% |
GDMA vs. VCAR - Expense Ratio Comparison
GDMA has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is lower than VCAR's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
GDMA vs. VCAR - Dividend Comparison
GDMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.51%, less than VCAR's 22.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDMA Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF | 2.51% | 2.79% | 2.32% | 4.14% | 1.18% | 2.10% | 0.62% | 3.17% |
VCAR Simplify Volt RoboCar Disruption and Tech ETF | 22.86% | 23.87% | 0.62% | 0.00% | 0.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GDMA and VCAR have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VCAR has higher volatility (24.38%) compared to GDMA (6.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GDMA dropped -16.66% vs VCAR's -69.11%.
On 5-year performance, VCAR leads with 14.14% vs 7.66% for GDMA. On fees, GDMA is cheaper at 0.77% per year. On volatility, GDMA has been the lower-risk option at 6.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VCAR has performed better with a 14.14% return vs 7.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GDMA is cheaper with a 0.77% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for VCAR.
VCAR has the higher dividend yield at 22.86%, compared with 2.51% for GDMA.
GDMA is categorized as Hedge Fund, while VCAR is Consumer Discretionary Equities. They also come from different issuers: Gadsden and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.77% for GDMA and 0.95% for VCAR.
GDMA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs -0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GDMA and VCAR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer