GDLC vs. GPZ
GDLC (Grayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF) and GPZ (VanEck Alternative Asset Manager ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GDLC is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CoinDesk 5 Index, while GPZ is a Financials Equities fund tracking the MarketVector Alternative Asset Managers Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GDLC charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for GPZ.
Performance
GDLC vs. GPZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GDLC achieves a -28.93% return, which is significantly lower than GPZ's -19.37% return.
GDLC
- 1D
- -3.29%
- 1M
- -18.37%
- YTD
- -28.93%
- 6M
- -33.67%
- 1Y
- -33.81%
- 3Y*
- 64.48%
- 5Y*
- 2.21%
- 10Y*
- —
GPZ
- 1D
- -4.70%
- 1M
- -6.69%
- YTD
- -19.37%
- 6M
- -16.71%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GDLC vs. GPZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GDLC Grayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF | -28.93% | -5.76% |
GPZ VanEck Alternative Asset Manager ETF | -19.37% | 9.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between GDLC and GPZ is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2025 | 0.43 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GDLC vs. GPZ — Risk / Return Rank
GDLC
GPZ
GDLC vs. GPZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF (GDLC) and VanEck Alternative Asset Manager ETF (GPZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GDLC | GPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.64 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.09 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GDLC | GPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.70 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.03 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | -0.44 | +0.73 |
Drawdowns
GDLC vs. GPZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GDLC drawdown since its inception was -94.14%, which is greater than GPZ's maximum drawdown of -31.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDLC and GPZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GDLC | GPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.14% | -31.72% | -62.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -52.91% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -52.91% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -94.14% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -54.28% | -25.93% | -28.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -52.73% | -11.74% | -40.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 31.04% | — | — |
Volatility
GDLC vs. GPZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GDLC | GPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.78% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.66% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 48.54% | 27.33% | +21.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 74.43% | 27.33% | +47.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 93.91% | 27.33% | +66.58% |
GDLC vs. GPZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
GDLC has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than GPZ's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
GDLC vs. GPZ - Dividend Comparison
GDLC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GPZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
GDLC Grayscale CoinDesk Crypto 5 ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GPZ VanEck Alternative Asset Manager ETF | 1.03% | 0.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GDLC and GPZ have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GPZ is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GPZ is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for GDLC.
GPZ has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.00% for GDLC.
GDLC is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while GPZ is Financials Equities. GDLC tracks CoinDesk 5 Index, while GPZ tracks MarketVector Alternative Asset Managers Index. They also come from different issuers: Grayscale and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for GDLC and 0.40% for GPZ.
Find the right allocation for GDLC and GPZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer