GDDY vs. ANF
GDDY (GoDaddy Inc.) and ANF (Abercrombie & Fitch Co.) are both stocks. GDDY operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology), while ANF operates in Apparel Retail (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, GDDY returned 8.82%/yr vs 19.26%/yr for ANF. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GDDY vs. ANF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GDDY achieves a -38.56% return, which is significantly lower than ANF's -28.04% return. Over the past 10 years, GDDY has underperformed ANF with an annualized return of 8.82%, while ANF has yielded a comparatively higher 19.26% annualized return.
GDDY
- 1D
- 1.42%
- 1M
- -10.27%
- YTD
- -38.56%
- 6M
- -38.91%
- 1Y
- -56.62%
- 3Y*
- 0.78%
- 5Y*
- -1.63%
- 10Y*
- 8.82%
ANF
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 25.24%
- YTD
- -28.04%
- 6M
- -19.20%
- 1Y
- 21.31%
- 3Y*
- 37.30%
- 5Y*
- 16.01%
- 10Y*
- 19.26%
GDDY vs. ANF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GDDY GoDaddy Inc. | -38.56% | -37.13% | 85.92% | 41.89% | -11.83% | 2.30% | 22.13% | 3.51% | 30.51% | 43.86% |
ANF Abercrombie & Fitch Co. | -28.04% | -15.79% | 69.43% | 285.07% | -34.22% | 71.07% | 19.48% | -9.74% | 19.24% | 54.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between GDDY and ANF is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2015 | 0.22 |
The correlation between GDDY and ANF shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (1 year) to 0.26 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
GDDY:
$10.24B
ANF:
$4.14B
GDDY:
$6.32
ANF:
$10.45
GDDY:
12.07
ANF:
8.67
GDDY:
0.14
ANF:
0.00
GDDY:
2.09
ANF:
0.81
GDDY:
43.14
ANF:
3.09
GDDY:
$5.02B
ANF:
$5.28B
GDDY:
$3.10B
ANF:
$2.56B
GDDY:
$1.14B
ANF:
$727.85M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GDDY vs. ANF — Risk / Return Rank
GDDY
ANF
GDDY vs. ANF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GoDaddy Inc. (GDDY) and Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GDDY | ANF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.69 | 1.11 | -0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.98 | 0.33 | -1.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.54 | 0.62 | -2.16 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GDDY vs. ANF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GDDY drawdown since its inception was -64.93%, smaller than the maximum ANF drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDDY and ANF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GDDY | ANF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.93% | -86.59% | +21.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -58.26% | -45.65% | -12.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -64.93% | -65.89% | +0.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -64.93% | -69.93% | +5.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.93% | -72.45% | +7.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -64.43% | -52.91% | -11.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.86% | -42.90% | +29.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 37.14% | 24.42% | +12.72% |
Volatility
GDDY vs. ANF - Volatility Comparison
GoDaddy Inc. (GDDY) and Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF) have volatilities of 15.38% and 15.82%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GDDY | ANF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.38% | 15.82% | -0.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.86% | 38.52% | -5.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.98% | 61.90% | -23.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.91% | 61.04% | -28.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.36% | 61.00% | -26.64% |
Dividends
GDDY vs. ANF - Dividend Comparison
Neither GDDY nor ANF has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ANF Abercrombie & Fitch Co. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.98% | 4.63% | 3.99% | 4.59% | 6.67% | 2.96% |
GDDY GoDaddy Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
GDDY vs. ANF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between GoDaddy Inc. and Abercrombie & Fitch Co.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GDDY vs. ANF - Profitability Comparison
GDDY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, GoDaddy Inc. reported a gross profit of 807.80M and revenue of 1.27B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 63.8%.
ANF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Abercrombie & Fitch Co. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.11B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
GDDY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, GoDaddy Inc. reported an operating income of 310.50M and revenue of 1.27B, resulting in an operating margin of 24.5%.
ANF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Abercrombie & Fitch Co. reported an operating income of -2.76M and revenue of 1.11B, resulting in an operating margin of -0.3%.
GDDY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, GoDaddy Inc. reported a net income of 214.60M and revenue of 1.27B, resulting in a net margin of 16.9%.
ANF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Abercrombie & Fitch Co. reported a net income of 67.13M and revenue of 1.11B, resulting in a net margin of 6.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GDDY and ANF have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ANF has higher volatility (15.82%) compared to GDDY (15.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GDDY dropped -64.93% vs ANF's -86.59%.
ANF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.24 vs -1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GDDY and ANF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer