PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GD vs. TMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GD vs. TMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in General Dynamics Corporation (GD) and Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. (TMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GD achieves a 2.13% return, which is significantly higher than TMO's -18.87% return. Over the past 10 years, GD has underperformed TMO with an annualized return of 11.59%, while TMO has yielded a comparatively higher 12.28% annualized return.


GD

1D
-1.61%
1M
-1.64%
YTD
2.13%
6M
2.33%
1Y
25.55%
3Y*
19.52%
5Y*
14.60%
10Y*
11.59%

TMO

1D
-0.67%
1M
1.00%
YTD
-18.87%
6M
-17.21%
1Y
17.28%
3Y*
-2.93%
5Y*
1.21%
10Y*
12.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GD vs. TMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GD
General Dynamics Corporation
2.13%30.39%3.52%7.13%21.69%43.77%-13.14%14.80%-21.34%19.85%
TMO
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.
-18.87%11.78%-1.72%-3.36%-17.29%43.54%43.72%45.55%18.21%35.03%

Correlation

The correlation between GD and TMO is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 2, 1987

0.29

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GD:

$93.43B

TMO:

$175.17B

EPS

GD:

$15.92

TMO:

$18.22

PE Ratio

GD:

21.41

TMO:

25.78

PS Ratio

GD:

1.73

TMO:

3.91

PB Ratio

GD:

3.58

TMO:

3.37

Total Revenue (TTM)

GD:

$53.81B

TMO:

$45.20B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GD:

$7.48B

TMO:

$17.81B

EBITDA (TTM)

GD:

$6.26B

TMO:

$11.16B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GD vs. TMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GD
GD Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
GD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GD Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
GD Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
GD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
GD Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

TMO
TMO Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
TMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMO Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
TMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMO Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GD vs. TMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for General Dynamics Corporation (GD) and Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. (TMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GDTMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.13

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.77

0.55

+1.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.11

1.23

+4.88

GD vs. TMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GD Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is higher than the TMO Sharpe Ratio of 0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GD and TMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GDTMODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.22

0.56

+0.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

0.04

+0.67

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

0.47

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.40

+0.17

Drawdowns

GD vs. TMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GD drawdown since its inception was -75.67%, which is greater than TMO's maximum drawdown of -71.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GD and TMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GDTMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.67%

-71.16%

-4.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.53%

-31.38%

+16.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.55%

-37.28%

+14.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.55%

-40.95%

+18.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.63%

-40.95%

-10.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.79%

-28.76%

+21.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.61%

-18.02%

+2.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.19%

14.09%

-9.90%

Volatility

GD vs. TMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for General Dynamics Corporation (GD) is 5.72%, while Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. (TMO) has a volatility of 9.96%. This indicates that GD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GDTMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.72%

9.96%

-4.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.14%

21.57%

-4.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.02%

31.02%

-10.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.40%

27.13%

-6.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.71%

26.33%

-3.62%

Dividends

GD vs. TMO - Dividend Comparison

GD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.79%, more than TMO's 0.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GD
General Dynamics Corporation
1.79%1.76%2.12%2.01%2.00%2.24%2.90%2.26%2.31%1.61%1.72%1.96%
TMO
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.
0.37%0.30%0.30%0.26%0.22%0.16%0.19%0.23%0.30%0.32%0.43%0.42%

Financials

GD vs. TMO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between General Dynamics Corporation and Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


9.00B10.00B11.00B12.00B13.00B14.00B20222023202420252026
13.48B
11.01B
(GD) Total Revenue
(TMO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

GD vs. TMO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between General Dynamics Corporation and Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
10.5%
40.7%
Portfolio components
GD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, General Dynamics Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.42B and revenue of 13.48B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.5%.

TMO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. reported a gross profit of 4.48B and revenue of 11.01B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.7%.

GD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, General Dynamics Corporation reported an operating income of 1.42B and revenue of 13.48B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.5%.

TMO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. reported an operating income of 1.86B and revenue of 11.01B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.9%.

GD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, General Dynamics Corporation reported a net income of 1.13B and revenue of 13.48B, resulting in a net margin of 8.4%.

TMO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. reported a net income of 1.65B and revenue of 11.01B, resulting in a net margin of 15.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


GD and TMO have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TMO has higher volatility (9.96%) compared to GD (5.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GD dropped -75.67% vs TMO's -71.16%.

GD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.22 vs 0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GD and TMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer