GCTIX vs. FASGX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

GCTIX (Goldman Sachs U.S. Tax-Managed Equity Fund) and FASGX (Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund) are both mutual funds - GCTIX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by BlackRock, while FASGX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by BlackRock. Over the past 10 years, GCTIX returned 14.16%/yr vs 10.31%/yr for FASGX. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GCTIX charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.67%/yr for FASGX.

Performance

GCTIX vs. FASGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs U.S. Tax-Managed Equity Fund (GCTIX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GCTIX achieves a 8.30% return, which is significantly lower than FASGX's 11.90% return. Over the past 10 years, GCTIX has outperformed FASGX with an annualized return of 14.16%, while FASGX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.31% annualized return.

GCTIX

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: 0.68%
• YTD: 8.30%
• 6M: 7.18%
• 1Y: 23.70%
• 3Y*: 20.73%
• 5Y*: 11.93%
• 10Y*: 14.16%

FASGX

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 2.06%
• YTD: 11.90%
• 6M: 11.55%
• 1Y: 25.19%
• 3Y*: 16.34%
• 5Y*: 8.28%
• 10Y*: 10.31%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GCTIX vs. FASGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GCTIX Goldman Sachs U.S. Tax-Managed Equity Fund	8.30%	15.35%	27.60%	23.80%	-20.26%	29.22%	17.53%	25.90%	-7.78%	20.29%
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund	11.90%	18.23%	10.81%	16.45%	-16.83%	13.98%	17.19%	22.81%	-7.65%	17.34%

Correlation

The correlation between GCTIX and FASGX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.91
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.93
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2001	0.94

The correlation between GCTIX and FASGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

GCTIX vs. FASGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GCTIX

GCTIX Risk / Return Rank: 50
GCTIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
GCTIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
GCTIX Omega Ratio Rank: 46
GCTIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
GCTIX Martin Ratio Rank: 60

FASGX

FASGX Risk / Return Rank: 77
FASGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
FASGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
FASGX Omega Ratio Rank: 75
FASGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
FASGX Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GCTIX vs. FASGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs U.S. Tax-Managed Equity Fund (GCTIX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GCTIX	FASGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.91	2.36	-0.45
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.65	3.26	-0.61
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.44	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.53	3.29	-0.76
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.17	14.19	-3.02

GCTIX vs. FASGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GCTIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is comparable to the FASGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GCTIX and FASGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GCTIX vs. FASGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GCTIX drawdown since its inception was -56.62%, which is greater than FASGX's maximum drawdown of -47.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCTIX and FASGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GCTIX	FASGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.62%	-47.35%	-9.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.98%	-7.95%	-2.03%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.19%	-12.80%	-7.39%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.86%	-23.54%	-2.32%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.54%	-27.20%	-8.34%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.62%	-0.12%	-1.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.79%	-6.70%	-3.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.25%	1.84%	+0.41%

Volatility

GCTIX vs. FASGX - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs U.S. Tax-Managed Equity Fund (GCTIX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX) have volatilities of 4.70% and 4.58%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GCTIX	FASGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.70%	4.58%	+0.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.40%	9.28%	+1.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.24%	11.10%	+2.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.90%	12.40%	+5.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.91%	12.71%	+6.20%

GCTIX vs. FASGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GCTIX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than FASGX's 0.67% expense ratio.

Dividends

GCTIX vs. FASGX - Dividend Comparison

GCTIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%, less than FASGX's 6.55% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund	6.55%	7.33%	4.60%	1.72%	6.69%	2.73%	2.20%	5.19%	6.31%	2.75%	0.20%	5.58%
GCTIX Goldman Sachs U.S. Tax-Managed Equity Fund	0.47%	0.51%	3.06%	0.52%	0.71%	0.42%	0.70%	0.68%	0.10%	0.86%	0.96%	1.02%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GCTIX and FASGX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, GCTIX and FASGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, GCTIX or FASGX?

GCTIX has higher volatility (4.70%) compared to FASGX (4.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GCTIX dropped -56.62% vs FASGX's -47.35%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FASGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.