GCOW vs. SRVR
GCOW (Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF) and SRVR (Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GCOW is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividends Index, while SRVR is a REIT fund tracking the FTSE Nareit All Equity REITs Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GCOW returned 13.35%/yr vs -3.01%/yr for SRVR. Their 0.48 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. GCOW charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for SRVR.
Performance
GCOW vs. SRVR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GCOW achieves a 14.77% return, which is significantly higher than SRVR's 8.80% return.
GCOW
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- 5.47%
- 6M
- 7.25%
- YTD
- 14.77%
- 1Y
- 27.77%
- 3Y*
- 16.05%
- 5Y*
- 13.35%
- 10Y*
- 9.89%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.57%
SRVR
- 1D
- -1.06%
- 1M
- -0.84%
- 6M
- 1.06%
- YTD
- 8.80%
- 1Y
- 0.43%
- 3Y*
- 4.12%
- 5Y*
- -3.01%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 5.00%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $12.71M | $12.72M | $12.45M | |
| $1.88M | $2.23M | $2.66M |
GCOW vs. SRVR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GCOW Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF | 14.77% | 27.34% | 3.52% | 13.95% | 5.49% | 14.58% | -4.33% | 17.81% | -7.61% |
SRVR Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF | 8.80% | -1.99% | 2.70% | 6.84% | -31.90% | 22.31% | 11.99% | 41.98% | -3.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between GCOW and SRVR is 0.38, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.49 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2018 | 0.48 |
The correlation between GCOW and SRVR shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (1 year) to 0.52 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GCOW vs. SRVR — Risk / Return Rank
GCOW
SRVR
GCOW vs. SRVR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW) and Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF (SRVR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GCOW | SRVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.01 | +0.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.61 | -0.02 | +3.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.15 | -0.05 | +11.19 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GCOW vs. SRVR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GCOW drawdown since its inception was -37.64%, smaller than the maximum SRVR drawdown of -40.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCOW and SRVR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GCOW | SRVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.64% | -40.99% | +3.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.83% | -15.01% | +7.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.35% | -18.34% | +5.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.48% | -40.99% | +19.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.64% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.73% | -20.33% | +19.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.82% | -15.30% | +9.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.53% | 6.18% | -3.65% |
Volatility
GCOW vs. SRVR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW) is 3.59%, while Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF (SRVR) has a volatility of 5.05%. This indicates that GCOW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SRVR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GCOW | SRVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.59% | 5.05% | -1.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.54% | 14.27% | -5.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.99% | 17.42% | -6.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.55% | 19.89% | -6.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.00% | 21.39% | -5.39% |
GCOW vs. SRVR - Expense Ratio Comparison
GCOW has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SRVR's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
GCOW vs. SRVR - Dividend Comparison
GCOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.58%, more than SRVR's 2.81% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GCOW Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF | 4.58% | 4.06% | 5.14% | 5.28% | 4.39% | 4.23% | 4.12% | 4.40% | 3.94% | 2.79% | 1.95% |
SRVR Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF | 2.81% | 2.67% | 2.00% | 3.69% | 1.70% | 1.19% | 1.59% | 1.61% | 2.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GCOW and SRVR have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SRVR has higher volatility (5.05%) compared to GCOW (3.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GCOW dropped -37.64% vs SRVR's -40.99%.
On 5-year performance, GCOW leads with 13.35% vs -3.01% for SRVR. On fees, SRVR is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, GCOW has been the lower-risk option at 3.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GCOW has performed better with a 13.35% return vs -3.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SRVR is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for GCOW.
GCOW has the higher dividend yield at 4.58%, compared with 2.81% for SRVR.
GCOW is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while SRVR is REIT. GCOW tracks Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividends Index, while SRVR tracks FTSE Nareit All Equity REITs Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for GCOW and 0.49% for SRVR.
GCOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs -0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GCOW and SRVR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer