PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GCOW vs. INDS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GCOW vs. INDS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW) and Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF (INDS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GCOW achieves a 12.18% return, which is significantly higher than INDS's 6.59% return.


GCOW

1D
-0.56%
1M
0.09%
YTD
12.18%
6M
13.23%
1Y
27.12%
3Y*
17.41%
5Y*
12.34%
10Y*
9.91%

INDS

1D
-0.04%
1M
-0.04%
YTD
6.59%
6M
5.24%
1Y
9.81%
3Y*
2.57%
5Y*
0.82%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GCOW vs. INDS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
GCOW
Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF
12.18%27.34%3.52%13.95%5.49%14.58%-4.33%17.81%-7.61%
INDS
Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF
6.59%7.78%-12.69%17.72%-32.68%54.61%12.62%42.25%-0.54%

Correlation

The correlation between GCOW and INDS is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2018

0.51

The correlation between GCOW and INDS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

GCOW vs. INDS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GCOW
INDS

Energy

24.4%

-

Consumer Defensive

17.1%

-

Healthcare

14.6%

-

Communication Services

14.6%

-

Industrials

12.4%

-

Basic Materials

7.3%

-

Consumer Cyclical

4.6%

-

Utilities

4.1%

-

Technology

0.9%

-

Financial Services

-

-

Real Estate

-

100.0%

Energy

GCOW
24.4%
INDS

-

Consumer Defensive

GCOW
17.1%
INDS

-

Healthcare

GCOW
14.6%
INDS

-

Communication Services

GCOW
14.6%
INDS

-

Industrials

GCOW
12.4%
INDS

-

Basic Materials

GCOW
7.3%
INDS

-

Consumer Cyclical

GCOW
4.6%
INDS

-

Utilities

GCOW
4.1%
INDS

-

Technology

GCOW
0.9%
INDS

-

Financial Services

GCOW

-

INDS

-

Real Estate

GCOW

-

INDS
100.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GCOW vs. INDS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GCOW
GCOW Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
GCOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GCOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
GCOW Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
GCOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
GCOW Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

INDS
INDS Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
INDS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INDS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
INDS Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
INDS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
INDS Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GCOW vs. INDS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW) and Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF (INDS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GCOWINDSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.11

+0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.71

0.81

+4.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.05

2.44

+12.61

GCOW vs. INDS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GCOW Sharpe Ratio is 2.52, which is higher than the INDS Sharpe Ratio of 0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GCOW and INDS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GCOWINDSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.52

0.61

+1.91

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

0.04

+0.88

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.38

+0.21

Drawdowns

GCOW vs. INDS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GCOW drawdown since its inception was -37.64%, smaller than the maximum INDS drawdown of -40.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCOW and INDS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GCOWINDSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.64%

-40.17%

+2.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.77%

-12.23%

+7.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.35%

-26.96%

+14.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.48%

-40.17%

+18.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.73%

-20.51%

+17.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.84%

-15.57%

+9.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.81%

4.04%

-2.23%

Volatility

GCOW vs. INDS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW) is 2.85%, while Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF (INDS) has a volatility of 5.23%. This indicates that GCOW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INDS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GCOWINDSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.85%

5.23%

-2.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.99%

12.10%

-4.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.81%

16.23%

-5.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.49%

20.16%

-6.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.20%

23.11%

-6.91%

GCOW vs. INDS - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both GCOW and INDS have an expense ratio of 0.60%.


Dividends

GCOW vs. INDS - Dividend Comparison

GCOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.43%, more than INDS's 3.55% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
GCOW
Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF
4.43%4.06%5.14%5.28%4.39%4.23%4.12%4.40%3.94%2.79%1.95%
INDS
Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF
3.55%3.70%3.75%3.11%2.63%1.24%1.68%2.26%1.81%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GCOW and INDS have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

INDS has higher volatility (5.23%) compared to GCOW (2.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GCOW dropped -37.64% vs INDS's -40.17%.

On 5-year performance, GCOW leads with 12.34% vs 0.82% for INDS. Both ETFs have the same 0.60% expense ratio. On volatility, GCOW has been the lower-risk option at 2.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, GCOW has performed better with a 12.34% return vs 0.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GCOW and INDS have the same expense ratio: 0.60% per year.

GCOW has the higher dividend yield at 4.43%, compared with 3.55% for INDS.

GCOW is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while INDS is REIT. GCOW tracks Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividends Index, while INDS tracks Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR Index.

GCOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GCOW and INDS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer