GCOW vs. INDS
GCOW (Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF) and INDS (Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GCOW is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividends Index, while INDS is a REIT fund tracking the Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GCOW returned 12.34%/yr vs 0.82%/yr for INDS. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.60% expense ratio.
Performance
GCOW vs. INDS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GCOW achieves a 12.18% return, which is significantly higher than INDS's 6.59% return.
GCOW
- 1D
- -0.56%
- 1M
- 0.09%
- YTD
- 12.18%
- 6M
- 13.23%
- 1Y
- 27.12%
- 3Y*
- 17.41%
- 5Y*
- 12.34%
- 10Y*
- 9.91%
INDS
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- -0.04%
- YTD
- 6.59%
- 6M
- 5.24%
- 1Y
- 9.81%
- 3Y*
- 2.57%
- 5Y*
- 0.82%
- 10Y*
- —
GCOW vs. INDS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GCOW Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF | 12.18% | 27.34% | 3.52% | 13.95% | 5.49% | 14.58% | -4.33% | 17.81% | -7.61% |
INDS Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF | 6.59% | 7.78% | -12.69% | 17.72% | -32.68% | 54.61% | 12.62% | 42.25% | -0.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between GCOW and INDS is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2018 | 0.51 |
The correlation between GCOW and INDS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.
GCOW vs. INDS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GCOW
INDS
Energy
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Communication Services
-
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Utilities
-
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
-
Real Estate
-
Energy
GCOW
INDS
-
Consumer Defensive
GCOW
INDS
-
Healthcare
GCOW
INDS
-
Communication Services
GCOW
INDS
-
Industrials
GCOW
INDS
-
Basic Materials
GCOW
INDS
-
Consumer Cyclical
GCOW
INDS
-
Utilities
GCOW
INDS
-
Technology
GCOW
INDS
-
Financial Services
GCOW
-
INDS
-
Real Estate
GCOW
-
INDS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GCOW vs. INDS — Risk / Return Rank
GCOW
INDS
GCOW vs. INDS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW) and Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF (INDS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GCOW | INDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.11 | +0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.71 | 0.81 | +4.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.05 | 2.44 | +12.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GCOW | INDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.52 | 0.61 | +1.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 | 0.04 | +0.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | 0.38 | +0.21 |
Drawdowns
GCOW vs. INDS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GCOW drawdown since its inception was -37.64%, smaller than the maximum INDS drawdown of -40.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCOW and INDS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GCOW | INDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.64% | -40.17% | +2.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.77% | -12.23% | +7.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.35% | -26.96% | +14.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.48% | -40.17% | +18.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.64% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.73% | -20.51% | +17.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.84% | -15.57% | +9.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.81% | 4.04% | -2.23% |
Volatility
GCOW vs. INDS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW) is 2.85%, while Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF (INDS) has a volatility of 5.23%. This indicates that GCOW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INDS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GCOW | INDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.85% | 5.23% | -2.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.99% | 12.10% | -4.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.81% | 16.23% | -5.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.49% | 20.16% | -6.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.20% | 23.11% | -6.91% |
GCOW vs. INDS - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both GCOW and INDS have an expense ratio of 0.60%.
Dividends
GCOW vs. INDS - Dividend Comparison
GCOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.43%, more than INDS's 3.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GCOW Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF | 4.43% | 4.06% | 5.14% | 5.28% | 4.39% | 4.23% | 4.12% | 4.40% | 3.94% | 2.79% | 1.95% |
INDS Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF | 3.55% | 3.70% | 3.75% | 3.11% | 2.63% | 1.24% | 1.68% | 2.26% | 1.81% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GCOW and INDS have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
INDS has higher volatility (5.23%) compared to GCOW (2.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GCOW dropped -37.64% vs INDS's -40.17%.
On 5-year performance, GCOW leads with 12.34% vs 0.82% for INDS. Both ETFs have the same 0.60% expense ratio. On volatility, GCOW has been the lower-risk option at 2.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GCOW has performed better with a 12.34% return vs 0.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GCOW and INDS have the same expense ratio: 0.60% per year.
GCOW has the higher dividend yield at 4.43%, compared with 3.55% for INDS.
GCOW is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while INDS is REIT. GCOW tracks Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividends Index, while INDS tracks Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR Index.
GCOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GCOW and INDS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer