GCOW vs. FYLD
GCOW (Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF) and FYLD (Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GCOW is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividends Index, while FYLD is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Cambria. GCOW is passively managed, while FYLD is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, GCOW returned 10.01%/yr vs 11.83%/yr for FYLD. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GCOW charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for FYLD.
Performance
GCOW vs. FYLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GCOW achieves a 11.34% return, which is significantly lower than FYLD's 19.06% return. Over the past 10 years, GCOW has underperformed FYLD with an annualized return of 10.01%, while FYLD has yielded a comparatively higher 11.83% annualized return.
GCOW
- 1D
- -1.25%
- 1M
- -1.16%
- YTD
- 11.34%
- 6M
- 11.61%
- 1Y
- 23.30%
- 3Y*
- 15.71%
- 5Y*
- 12.27%
- 10Y*
- 10.01%
FYLD
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- -0.10%
- YTD
- 19.06%
- 6M
- 19.12%
- 1Y
- 37.39%
- 3Y*
- 21.45%
- 5Y*
- 11.67%
- 10Y*
- 11.83%
GCOW vs. FYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GCOW Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF | 11.34% | 27.34% | 3.52% | 13.95% | 5.49% | 14.58% | -4.33% | 17.81% | -7.99% | 20.71% |
FYLD Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF | 19.06% | 34.53% | 3.00% | 13.18% | -5.53% | 18.67% | 4.17% | 17.83% | -14.47% | 29.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between GCOW and FYLD is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2016 | 0.78 |
The correlation between GCOW and FYLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
GCOW vs. FYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GCOW
FYLD
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
-
Communication Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Technology
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
-
Energy
GCOW
FYLD
Consumer Defensive
GCOW
FYLD
Healthcare
GCOW
FYLD
-
Communication Services
GCOW
FYLD
Industrials
GCOW
FYLD
Basic Materials
GCOW
FYLD
Consumer Cyclical
GCOW
FYLD
Utilities
GCOW
FYLD
Technology
GCOW
FYLD
Financial Services
GCOW
-
FYLD
Real Estate
GCOW
-
FYLD
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GCOW vs. FYLD — Risk / Return Rank
GCOW
FYLD
GCOW vs. FYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW) and Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF (FYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GCOW | FYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.56 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.91 | 6.91 | -2.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.49 | 24.32 | -11.82 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GCOW vs. FYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GCOW drawdown since its inception was -37.64%, smaller than the maximum FYLD drawdown of -44.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCOW and FYLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GCOW | FYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.64% | -44.55% | +6.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.77% | -5.44% | +0.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.35% | -15.15% | +2.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.48% | -25.12% | +3.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.64% | -44.55% | +6.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.46% | -1.08% | -2.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.83% | -8.81% | +2.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.88% | 1.54% | +0.34% |
Volatility
GCOW vs. FYLD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW) is 2.74%, while Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF (FYLD) has a volatility of 3.78%. This indicates that GCOW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GCOW | FYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.74% | 3.78% | -1.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.07% | 9.24% | -1.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.92% | 11.87% | -0.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.51% | 16.28% | -2.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.18% | 18.01% | -1.83% |
GCOW vs. FYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
GCOW has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than FYLD's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
GCOW vs. FYLD - Dividend Comparison
GCOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.72%, more than FYLD's 3.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FYLD Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF | 3.63% | 4.07% | 5.41% | 6.06% | 6.13% | 4.74% | 3.94% | 3.73% | 5.17% | 2.85% | 2.72% | 3.98% |
GCOW Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF | 4.72% | 4.06% | 5.14% | 5.28% | 4.39% | 4.23% | 4.12% | 4.40% | 3.94% | 2.79% | 1.95% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GCOW and FYLD have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FYLD has higher volatility (3.78%) compared to GCOW (2.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GCOW dropped -37.64% vs FYLD's -44.55%.
On 10-year performance, FYLD leads with 11.83% vs 10.01% for GCOW. On fees, FYLD is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, GCOW has been the lower-risk option at 2.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FYLD has performed better with a 11.83% return vs 10.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FYLD is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for GCOW.
GCOW has the higher dividend yield at 4.72%, compared with 3.63% for FYLD.
GCOW is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while FYLD is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Cambria. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for GCOW and 0.59% for FYLD.
FYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.17 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GCOW and FYLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer