GCOR vs. GGUS
GCOR (Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF) and GGUS (Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Growth Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GCOR is a Intermediate Core Bond fund tracking the FTSE Goldman Sachs US Broad Bond Market Index, while GGUS is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth 40 Act Daily Capped Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, GCOR returned 4.38% vs 21.28% for GGUS. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GCOR charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for GGUS.
Performance
GCOR vs. GGUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GCOR achieves a 0.33% return, which is significantly lower than GGUS's 4.78% return.
GCOR
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- 0.64%
- YTD
- 0.33%
- 6M
- 0.43%
- 1Y
- 4.38%
- 3Y*
- 3.67%
- 5Y*
- -0.28%
- 10Y*
- —
GGUS
- 1D
- -0.86%
- 1M
- -1.11%
- YTD
- 4.78%
- 6M
- 3.88%
- 1Y
- 21.28%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GCOR vs. GGUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GCOR Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 0.33% | 7.22% | 0.51% | 3.96% |
GGUS Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Growth Equity ETF | 4.78% | 17.32% | 30.88% | 4.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between GCOR and GGUS is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2023 | 0.15 |
The correlation between GCOR and GGUS shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (all time) to 0.30 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GCOR vs. GGUS — Risk / Return Rank
GCOR
GGUS
GCOR vs. GGUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (GCOR) and Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Growth Equity ETF (GGUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GCOR | GGUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.24 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.56 | 1.43 | +0.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.49 | 4.84 | -0.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GCOR vs. GGUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GCOR drawdown since its inception was -18.94%, smaller than the maximum GGUS drawdown of -22.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCOR and GGUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GCOR | GGUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.94% | -22.59% | +3.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.82% | -14.91% | +12.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.09% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.63% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.35% | -3.84% | +0.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.95% | -3.20% | -4.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.98% | 4.41% | -3.43% |
Volatility
GCOR vs. GGUS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (GCOR) is 1.05%, while Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Growth Equity ETF (GGUS) has a volatility of 5.55%. This indicates that GCOR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GGUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GCOR | GGUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.05% | 5.55% | -4.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.75% | 12.14% | -9.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.62% | 15.64% | -12.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.81% | 19.04% | -13.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.51% | 19.04% | -13.53% |
GCOR vs. GGUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
GCOR has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than GGUS's 0.12% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
GCOR vs. GGUS - Dividend Comparison
GCOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.16%, more than GGUS's 0.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GCOR Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 4.16% | 4.03% | 4.36% | 3.67% | 2.11% | 0.92% | 0.24% |
GGUS Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Growth Equity ETF | 0.42% | 0.43% | 0.68% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GCOR and GGUS have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GGUS has higher volatility (5.55%) compared to GCOR (1.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GCOR dropped -18.94% vs GGUS's -22.59%.
On 1-year performance, GGUS leads with 21.28% vs 4.38% for GCOR. On fees, GCOR is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, GCOR has been the lower-risk option at 1.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GGUS has performed better with a 21.28% return vs 4.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GCOR is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for GGUS.
GCOR has the higher dividend yield at 4.16%, compared with 0.42% for GGUS.
GCOR is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while GGUS is Large Cap Growth Equities. GCOR tracks FTSE Goldman Sachs US Broad Bond Market Index, while GGUS tracks Russell 1000 Growth 40 Act Daily Capped Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for GCOR and 0.12% for GGUS.
GGUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GCOR and GGUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer