GCOR vs. GGUS
Compare and contrast key facts about Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (GCOR) and Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Growth Equity ETF (GGUS).
GCOR and GGUS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GCOR is a passively managed fund by Goldman Sachs that tracks the performance of the FTSE Goldman Sachs US Broad Bond Market Index. It was launched on Sep 8, 2020. GGUS is a passively managed fund by Goldman Sachs that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth 40 Act Daily Capped Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Nov 28, 2023. Both GCOR and GGUS are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
GCOR vs. GGUS - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GCOR vs. GGUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GCOR Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 0.09% | 7.22% | 0.51% | 4.07% |
GGUS Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Growth Equity ETF | -8.81% | 17.32% | 30.88% | 4.54% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GCOR achieves a 0.09% return, which is significantly higher than GGUS's -8.81% return.
GCOR
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- -1.76%
- YTD
- 0.09%
- 6M
- 1.02%
- 1Y
- 4.41%
- 3Y*
- 3.40%
- 5Y*
- -0.07%
- 10Y*
- —
GGUS
- 1D
- 3.65%
- 1M
- -5.28%
- YTD
- -8.81%
- 6M
- -8.20%
- 1Y
- 17.99%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GCOR vs. GGUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
GCOR has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than GGUS's 0.12% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
GCOR vs. GGUS — Risk / Return Rank
GCOR
GGUS
GCOR vs. GGUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (GCOR) and Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Growth Equity ETF (GGUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GCOR | GGUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.03 | 0.83 | +0.20 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.43 | 1.33 | +0.09 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.19 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.83 | 1.21 | +0.62 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.05 | 4.22 | +0.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GCOR | GGUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.03 | 0.83 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.10 | 0.93 | -1.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between GCOR and GGUS is 0.11, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
GCOR vs. GGUS - Dividend Comparison
GCOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.08%, more than GGUS's 0.48% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GCOR Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 4.08% | 4.03% | 4.36% | 3.67% | 2.11% | 0.92% | 0.24% |
GGUS Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Growth Equity ETF | 0.48% | 0.43% | 0.68% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
GCOR vs. GGUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GCOR drawdown since its inception was -18.94%, smaller than the maximum GGUS drawdown of -22.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCOR and GGUS.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GCOR | GGUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.94% | -22.59% | +3.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.53% | -14.91% | +12.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.63% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.59% | -11.80% | +8.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.14% | -3.22% | -4.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.92% | 4.30% | -3.38% |
Volatility
GCOR vs. GGUS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Access U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (GCOR) is 1.60%, while Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Growth Equity ETF (GGUS) has a volatility of 6.60%. This indicates that GCOR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GGUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GCOR | GGUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.60% | 6.60% | -5.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.45% | 12.07% | -9.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.30% | 21.80% | -17.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.78% | 19.29% | -13.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.57% | 19.29% | -13.72% |