PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GCGIX vs. GLEIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GCGIX vs. GLEIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Large Cap Growth Insights Fund (GCGIX) and Goldman Sachs Energy Infrastructure Fund (GLEIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GCGIX achieves a -1.07% return, which is significantly lower than GLEIX's 23.92% return.


GCGIX

1D
-1.47%
1M
-4.49%
YTD
-1.07%
6M
-2.58%
1Y
13.05%
3Y*
24.84%
5Y*
13.97%
10Y*
17.69%

GLEIX

1D
1.45%
1M
-4.16%
YTD
23.92%
6M
24.21%
1Y
26.76%
3Y*
33.51%
5Y*
23.23%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GCGIX vs. GLEIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GCGIX
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Growth Insights Fund
-1.07%15.51%53.44%37.56%-29.62%29.10%32.21%29.70%-4.58%4.42%
GLEIX
Goldman Sachs Energy Infrastructure Fund
23.92%5.30%58.18%15.08%18.96%38.31%-17.46%16.95%-15.17%6.98%

Correlation

The correlation between GCGIX and GLEIX is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2017

0.38

The correlation between GCGIX and GLEIX shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to 0.38 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GCGIX vs. GLEIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GCGIX
GCGIX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
GCGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GCGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
GCGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
GCGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
GCGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

GLEIX
GLEIX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
GLEIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLEIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLEIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
GLEIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLEIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GCGIX vs. GLEIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Large Cap Growth Insights Fund (GCGIX) and Goldman Sachs Energy Infrastructure Fund (GLEIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GCGIXGLEIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.32

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.86

3.84

-2.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.75

9.03

-6.28

GCGIX vs. GLEIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GCGIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.91, which is lower than the GLEIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GCGIX and GLEIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GCGIX vs. GLEIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GCGIX drawdown since its inception was -65.78%, which is greater than GLEIX's maximum drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCGIX and GLEIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GCGIXGLEIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.78%

-59.27%

-6.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.25%

-7.29%

-9.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.10%

-17.07%

-8.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.57%

-21.89%

-10.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.11%

-4.45%

-2.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.79%

-8.51%

-12.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.38%

3.09%

+2.29%

Volatility

GCGIX vs. GLEIX - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs Large Cap Growth Insights Fund (GCGIX) and Goldman Sachs Energy Infrastructure Fund (GLEIX) have volatilities of 5.81% and 5.56%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GCGIXGLEIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.81%

5.56%

+0.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.79%

11.33%

+1.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.43%

14.76%

+1.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.35%

20.58%

+1.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.59%

25.42%

-3.83%

GCGIX vs. GLEIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GCGIX has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is lower than GLEIX's 1.23% expense ratio.


Dividends

GCGIX vs. GLEIX - Dividend Comparison

GCGIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.58%, less than GLEIX's 8.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GCGIX
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Growth Insights Fund
7.58%7.50%23.16%7.08%19.27%42.43%9.71%4.02%10.10%4.76%0.76%0.87%
GLEIX
Goldman Sachs Energy Infrastructure Fund
8.07%10.00%25.43%10.22%4.70%8.41%4.17%4.83%3.54%0.68%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GCGIX and GLEIX have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GCGIX has higher volatility (5.81%) compared to GLEIX (5.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GCGIX dropped -65.78% vs GLEIX's -59.27%.

GLEIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GCGIX and GLEIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer