PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
GCGIX vs. SCHG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between GCGIX and SCHG is 0.97, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.01.0

Performance

GCGIX vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Goldman Sachs Large Cap Growth Insights Fund (GCGIX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
1.30%
13.95%
GCGIX
SCHG

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

GCGIX:

0.77

SCHG:

1.64

Sortino Ratio

GCGIX:

1.04

SCHG:

2.19

Omega Ratio

GCGIX:

1.17

SCHG:

1.30

Calmar Ratio

GCGIX:

0.37

SCHG:

2.37

Martin Ratio

GCGIX:

2.71

SCHG:

8.98

Ulcer Index

GCGIX:

5.96%

SCHG:

3.27%

Daily Std Dev

GCGIX:

20.87%

SCHG:

17.91%

Max Drawdown

GCGIX:

-68.37%

SCHG:

-34.59%

Current Drawdown

GCGIX:

-33.16%

SCHG:

-1.27%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GCGIX achieves a 2.12% return, which is significantly lower than SCHG's 3.09% return. Over the past 10 years, GCGIX has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 4.33%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 16.44% annualized return.


GCGIX

YTD

2.12%

1M

0.52%

6M

1.30%

1Y

17.66%

5Y*

-0.28%

10Y*

4.33%

SCHG

YTD

3.09%

1M

0.91%

6M

13.95%

1Y

31.06%

5Y*

18.74%

10Y*

16.44%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GCGIX vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

GCGIX has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.


GCGIX
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Growth Insights Fund
Expense ratio chart for GCGIX: current value at 0.54% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.54%
Expense ratio chart for SCHG: current value at 0.04% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.04%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

GCGIX vs. SCHG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GCGIX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GCGIX is 3838
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GCGIX is 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GCGIX is 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GCGIX is 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GCGIX is 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GCGIX is 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SCHG is 6969
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SCHG is 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SCHG is 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SCHG is 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SCHG is 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SCHG is 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

GCGIX vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Large Cap Growth Insights Fund (GCGIX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GCGIX, currently valued at 0.77, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.000.771.64
The chart of Sortino ratio for GCGIX, currently valued at 1.04, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.001.042.19
The chart of Omega ratio for GCGIX, currently valued at 1.17, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.171.30
The chart of Calmar ratio for GCGIX, currently valued at 0.37, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.000.372.37
The chart of Martin ratio for GCGIX, currently valued at 2.71, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.002.718.98
GCGIX
SCHG

The current GCGIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.77, which is lower than the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GCGIX and SCHG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
0.77
1.64
GCGIX
SCHG

Dividends

GCGIX vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

GCGIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, less than SCHG's 0.38% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
GCGIX
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Growth Insights Fund
0.05%0.05%0.08%0.48%0.22%0.27%0.69%0.76%0.59%0.76%0.87%0.96%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.38%0.40%0.46%0.55%0.42%0.52%0.82%1.27%1.01%1.04%1.22%1.09%

Drawdowns

GCGIX vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GCGIX drawdown since its inception was -68.37%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCGIX and SCHG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-33.16%
-1.27%
GCGIX
SCHG

Volatility

GCGIX vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

Goldman Sachs Large Cap Growth Insights Fund (GCGIX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) have volatilities of 5.03% and 5.01%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
5.03%
5.01%
GCGIX
SCHG
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab